What is so stupid in all the Madrid media narrative that they can’t explain is why exactly he specifically “dreams” of Real Madrid. Even if it were true that in three years he’d want a move, why would it be Real Madrid? What if Barcelona were to be in better shape, for instance? That’s when they need those ridiculous “pre-agreement” and “vinculantismo” non-sensical theories to justify the holes in the narrative lolWell yeah, but apart from all that...Madrid
:-)
If i had a clue what vinculantismo meant, I might agree with you :-)What is so stupid in all the Madrid media narrative that they can’t explain is why exactly he specifically “dreams” of Real Madrid. Even if it were true that in three years he’d want a move, why would it be Real Madrid? What if Barcelona were to be in better shape, for instance? That’s when they need those ridiculous “pre-agreement” and “vinculantismo” non-sensical theories to justify the holes in the narrative lol
But these are different things. Release clauses are meant exactly for the club not to stand in the way, whereas the point was that we wouldn’t keep an unhappy player that wants out regardless of clause. And @tolmie's hairdoo has said there is no buyout clauseSo you don't think a conversation around a potential release clause will have taken place?
All the piss will have evaporated long before thenAll this bollocks about Haaland being better/used to a counter attacking set up and won’t fit in.
Imagine the increased level of piss boiling when the trolls find out he’s even better with a more dominant team.
Delighted to see he is getting on well.Just remembered how happy I was back when Enes Unal signed and someone dug up an old tweet from 2012 where him and his family were celebrating because they were City supporters.
Fast forward to now and we're talking about signing one of the very best strikers in the world who grew up going to our games. Crazy stuff to think about.
Meanwhile, Unal is having a very good season with Getafe. Happy for him.
ignore them the best you can.How many times are you going to reference that when I immediately explained what I meant and apologized for the poor use of words just a few posts later? Do you think it’s fair to be doing that to me? What else do you expect me to do? I am not the only person in this forum who made a mistake and apologized. Why this heavy persecution is beyond my comprehension. If you ask me to leave the forum over that mistake I swear I will. Just please stop doing that
Agreed, but we were talking about what Ballague had said/claimed was said. It's not a stretch or unbelievable that it wasn't discussed. I doubt however it was the deal maker. Anyway, were off on a tangent nowBut these are different things. Release clauses are meant exactly for the club not to stand in the way, whereas the point was that we wouldn’t keep an unhappy player that wants out regardless of clause. And @tolmie's hairdoo has said there is no buyout clause