Or they're hopeful that no one can afford him this Summer and they'll join the auction next year when his clause kicks in.
Edit: I know that doesn't tie in with Woodies normal modus operandi but who knows.
They wouldn't be the only ones.
Or they're hopeful that no one can afford him this Summer and they'll join the auction next year when his clause kicks in.
Edit: I know that doesn't tie in with Woodies normal modus operandi but who knows.
Got a feeling Dortmund will price him out of a move even with the clause for next summer.....they may well lose around 30m in transfer fee but they strike me as the type of club that would be will8ing to take that hit.
If this is the case I wonder what we do....stick for a year with what we have or ho for someone different .if we got someone else that could then see us out of the race for him the following summer
That’s not going to happen as I have been saying all along. He’s leaving this summer. Dortmund can’t betray the way they operate with agents or their entire model collapses.Got a feeling Dortmund will price him out of a move even with the clause for next summer.....they may well lose around 30m in transfer fee but they strike me as the type of club that would be will8ing to take that hit.
Not a chance, Riola propaganda in full flow.
Ah, Master Bates!It's not Raiola propaganda, trust me!
It's United propaganda.
They can't afford him, fear City are in the box seat, so are trying to get their damage limitation in early, whilst also burnishing the narrative no top player would move to City but for ridiculous money.
The author of the £1m per-week wages at the weekend was Steve Bates and that's all you need to know... a United mouthpiece.
Others chancers such as Ornstein then further recycle the same myth the day after.
It's the same shit sandwich served with different bread.
Thanks for the update, it's put a warm glow into me, those Raggy's really are desperate and it's lovely to hear and see.It's not Raiola propaganda, trust me!
It's United propaganda.
They can't afford him, fear City are in the box seat, so are trying to get their damage limitation in early, whilst also burnishing the narrative no top player would move to City but for ridiculous money.
The author of the £1m per-week wages at the weekend was Steve Bates and that's all you need to know... a United mouthpiece.
Others chancers such as Ornstein then further recycle the same myth the day after.
It's the same shit sandwich served with different bread.
I know it shouldn’t but it infuriates me these type of childish tactics, I sincerely hope not just us but all fair minded fans see through it.It's not Raiola propaganda, trust me!
It's United propaganda.
They can't afford him, fear City are in the box seat, so are trying to get their damage limitation in early, whilst also burnishing the narrative no top player would move to City but for ridiculous money.
The author of the £1m per-week wages at the weekend was Steve Bates and that's all you need to know... a United mouthpiece.
Others chancers such as Ornstein then further recycle the same myth the day after.
It's the same shit sandwich served with different bread.
I hope we're doing everything in our power to bankrupt that wretched club in the next decade or two.It's not Raiola propaganda, trust me!
It's United propaganda.
They can't afford him, fear City are in the box seat, so are trying to get their damage limitation in early, whilst also burnishing the narrative no top player would move to City but for ridiculous money.
The author of the £1m per-week wages at the weekend was Steve Bates and that's all you need to know... a United mouthpiece.
Others chancers such as Ornstein then further recycle the same myth the day after.
It's the same shit sandwich served with different bread.
Ah, Master Bates!