samuelyeboah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 May 2021
- Messages
- 7,097
- Team supported
- Manchester City
count on fab to say literally nothing new
Guess it's Madrid vs City
You may be right but if you are and any 'good' natural striker would score a hatful, then it's another reason why we wouldn't stretch to the figures rported for Haaland. Of course the reports could be bollocks so in that case we may well go for him . Wait and see I guess.
No not the €75 mill transfer or even the €40 reported agent fees.The figures reported, as in, 75m? We wouldn't pay 75m for a young hugely talented striker that scores record breaking numbers of goals, has multiple strengths and qualities including being blessed with pace, with many years ahead of him. On a position we have needed strengthening for a number of years now, that replaces our greatest scorer, for which there are few top quality options out there and fewer reasonably priced average options. With a set release clause by all accounts. Yeah that's not how we operate at all.
The problem is many people have read two gossip finger in the air articles exaggerated for shock value on supposed megabuster 'demands', have taken them as gospel by choice and will preach it now.
Let's see what happens next window or two. I'm not expecting it as such, but not because the club won't entertain the idea because of a negotiate figure here and there.
No not the €75 mill transfer or even the €40 reported agent fees.
I was talking about the €500k after tax wages, which we won’t go anywhere near. Yes they may be exaggerated, which is why I said if the reported demands are true, so there was no taking as gospel not sure anybody is taking those figures as gospel.
No the comments are we won’t go anywhere near what’s been reported, which is probably right, nobody has suggest those reports are right though and if they aren’t we will probably be in the market for him. You are over thinking it.More or less every third comment is how we wont go anywhere near this because of the money involved. And you seem to think fhere must be something in the wages claimed. Which his own agent has publicly dismissed. The boy's entpurage keep talking about prioritising a footballing project, his dad talks about dping whats best for him as a footballer. Yet the assumption is we'd turn our noses up because a couple papers threw some shit at a wall and it stuck.
His wages Will likely be significant though. And so they should. As would the wages of any top player we go for, particularly striker, and one capable of delivering goals. But as you so often argue, not for you me or anyone to worry about.
don't think so. bayern are having problems at the moment extending contracts. since the sane numbers leaked, every top player requests the same (kimmich (yeah he extended but probably a top 20 maybe even 10 player in the world, thats why they are willing pay 20mio a year), goretzka, coman etc). haaland would cause even bigger issues. I know they will have to replace lewa soonish but he is just like ronaldo, pro through and trhough and I think no big injuries. so atleast 2 or 3 more years at top or very high level. they do not need haaland to win the league.If we want him then we need to be making a deal in January. I think Bayern Munich could be the favourites to sign him tbh.
Rat Face is a complete KFA ex-Rag piece of scum, who just spews typical Rag bile, like a lot of their delusional fans!Neville again pushing his club to buy him and it won’t effect Ronaldo! One thing we can’t do is let those scum bags get him! Unless Haaland heart set on Madrid and that’s where he is going fair enough but if he is undecided we should offer what they want!
As their fans have been saying for years about any good or up and coming player..."Should be at united him" as if they have a divine right to have all decent players before any other club.....Arse wipes of the highest order all of themRat Face is a complete KFA ex-Rag piece of scum, who just spews typical Rag bile, like a lot of their delusional fans!
If we want him then we need to be making a deal in January. I think Bayern Munich could be the favourites to sign him tbh.
Whoever pays Raiola the most will get him unfortunately.They (Haaland camp) have not set up this release clause for him to be sold before, nor will they be interested in signing anything prior.
This sale will be concluded in the summer when the market is most buoyant and every party will have been allowed to put in their best offer and no doubt then match other offers. No chance of any party getting it done early.
Nothing will be done for the benefit of anyone bar Haaland.
It is a simple market strategy to extract the most amount of money (this is not necessarily selling to the highest bidder, he may choose a different offer but will definitely be the highest amount that team was ever going go too).
Personally I think we’re ready for a superstar and will have one of the best hands at the table. Whether we are the chosen one only time will tell, but I do fancy we have a lot in our favour this time.
They (Haaland camp) have not set up this release clause for him to be sold before, nor will they be interested in signing anything prior.
This sale will be concluded in the summer when the market is most buoyant and every party will have been allowed to put in their best offer and no doubt then match other offers. No chance of any party getting it done early.
Nothing will be done for the benefit of anyone bar Haaland.
It is a simple market strategy to extract the most amount of money (this is not necessarily selling to the highest bidder, he may choose a different offer but will definitely be the highest amount that team was ever going go too).
Personally I think we’re ready for a superstar and will have one of the best hands at the table. Whether we are the chosen one only time will tell, but I do fancy we have a lot in our favour this time.
Maybe only if Haaland allows that to happen though.Whoever pays Raiola the most will get him unfortunately.
I don't have faith in his dad to do the right thing for his son's career. There is just too much money at stake. I believe Haaland will become the best player in the world for the next ten years but I just can't see City paying Raiola under the table and that is what he will demand. And sadly I can't see any other strikers out there who are truly fit to replace Sergio.Maybe only if Haaland allows that to happen though.
Raiola won't dictate where he goes, neither will his father......he will. Ridiculously naive to think he will be told who to sign for.I don't have faith in his dad to do the right thing for his son's career. There is just too much money at stake. I believe Haaland will become the best player in the world for the next ten years but I just can't see City paying Raiola under the table and that is what he will demand. And sadly I can't see any other strikers out there who are truly fit to replace Sergio.
May be true but it would be very strange to have a release clause mid season.In Spain they are convinced the clause starts in January, 2 years after Haaland joined Dortmund.