Erling Haaland

Status
Not open for further replies.
bobbyowenquiff said:
Whoever pays Raiola the most will get him unfortunately.
Click to expand...

Don’t agree Raiola will have an agents fee which will no doubt be Very, very high (possible towards Pogba’s) and if you don’t pay that you can’t do the deal.

Alfie will have one as well.

However as long as those are meet the factors such as wages, signing on fee etc. Project, where he wants to play will drive his decision.

Raiola will have a say but it won’t simply comes down to who gives him the most.
 
domalino said:
In Spain they are convinced the clause starts in January, 2 years after Haaland joined Dortmund.
Click to expand...

Regardless of whether it did or didn’t and I actually doubt it would.

He is not going to move in Jan, this is a summer transfer as he will be sold when the market is at his highest and that is not Jan.
 
Last edited:
Fuzzy80 said:
Don’t agree Raiola will have an agents fee which will no doubt be Very, very high (possible towards Pogba’s) and if you don’t pay that you can’t do the deal.

Alfie will have one as well.

However as long as those are meet the factors such as wages, signing on fee etc. Project, where he wants to play will drive his decision.

Raiola will have a say but it won’t simply comes down to who gives him the most.
Click to expand...
I hope you are right.
 
domalino said:
From a Dortmund perspective paying north of €50m (inc agents fees) for a player and accepting a €75m release clause wasn't sensible.

They were so desperate for Haaland all the rules went out the window.
Click to expand...

Did they not pay €20-25m for him? Thats what I had read. Even so, I would agree it wasn't sensible to include a release clause, but the balance is far less extreme. If the latter figure, it still guaranteed tripple what they paid for him, as a young and not that proven player, 2 years at least, and time yo find a replacement or convince him to stay.
 
Coatigan said:
Did they not pay €20-25m for him? Thats what I had read. Even so, I would agree it wasn't sensible to include a release clause, but the balance is far less extreme. If the latter figure, it still guaranteed tripple what they paid for him, as a young and not that proven player, 2 years at least, and time yo find a replacement or convince him to stay.
Click to expand...

www.marca.com

The real cost of signing Haaland: Huge commission to his father and Mino Raiola

Borussia Dortmund's signing of Erling Haaland is set to cost them a lot more than the 20 million euros stated by the club over the weekend....
www.marca.com www.marca.com
 
domalino said:
www.marca.com

The real cost of signing Haaland: Huge commission to his father and Mino Raiola

Borussia Dortmund's signing of Erling Haaland is set to cost them a lot more than the 20 million euros stated by the club over the weekend....
www.marca.com www.marca.com
Click to expand...

Thanks. Having read 'the true cost' on plenty of our transfers where some bored journalist throws every figure he can into the mix, I will discard that. His formal transfer fee reported was 20m. His release clause 75m. Daft yes, disproportionate, probably not If you add 35m onto that, sure, but that's not necessarily true.
 
Coatigan said:
Thanks. Having read 'the true cost' on plenty of our transfers where some bored journalist throws every figure he can into the mix, I will discard that. His formal transfer fee reported was 20m. His release clause 75m. Daft yes, disproportionate, probably not If you add 35m onto that, sure, but that's not necessarily true.
Click to expand...
Normal transfers don't include €25m in agents fees - more than the money spent on the player.

Discard if you want, it's still there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top