Pay a sign on bonus and keep the wages on par with the rest?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Erling Haaland
- Thread starter JOGAMIGMOG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
mexico1970
Well-Known Member
It's not a whine about Txiki, just that if he didn't want to renew, no matter how good he is, we won't get a huge fee for him as we (quite nobly in fact) accommodate that future decision from players.
I'll take 4/5 years of goals and any fee for him such is my opinion he'd score fuck loads.
£200m isn't feasible just.
I'd pay £200 million just to watch the media explode.
EL APACHE TEVEZ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 21,614
Depends on what fat boy wantsPay a sign on bonus and keep the wages on par with the rest?
cjn
Well-Known Member
I'd personally be disappointed if he "only" scored 150 goals in 5 seasons.Even if Haaland went on a free after 5 years, it'd hardly be the worst thing ever if he'd scored about 150 goals and only cost £65m or sumat, would it? Disappointing, but we'd have more than got our money's worth.
EL APACHE TEVEZ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 21,614
The money what’s involved I’d expect that a seasonI'd personally be disappointed if he "only" scored 150 goals in 5 seasons.
Mid Wales blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 4,634
Length of contract, I would think. Maybe City want 6 years, but Raiola wants only 5 years.I see thanks haha what do you think the major stumbling block on this deal would be?
It won’t be money as City can keep the week wage in line with KDB, and just increase his signing on fee!
Ghostofmerlin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2020
- Messages
- 1,339
- Team supported
- Manchester City
That's 30 a year, something that doesn't happen often in the PL, certainly not every year. I would be ecstatic with 25 a year.I'd personally be disappointed if he "only" scored 150 goals in 5 seasons.
cjn
Well-Known Member
This would make some sense. City want six years, would take five, and he's demanding four. Something like that.Length of contract, I would think. Maybe City want 6 years, but Raiola wants only 5 years.
It won’t be money as City can keep the week wage in line with KDB, and just increase his signing on fee!
- Status
- Not open for further replies.