Etihad Campus, Stadium and Collar Site Development Thread

Discussion in 'Bluemoon forum' started by Danamy, 12 Jun 2017.

  1. jrb

    jrb

    Joined:
    8 Oct 2008
    Messages:
    16,513
    The other one.

    But thanks.

    Forgot about that one.
     
  2. Shaelumstash

    Shaelumstash

    Joined:
    30 Apr 2009
    Messages:
    6,066
    @jrb sorry, this is the one I was talking about mate.
     
  3. jrb

    jrb

    Joined:
    8 Oct 2008
    Messages:
    16,513
    No probs.

    Completely forgot about that proposal.

    Didn’t like it then. Still don’t.

    Thanks.
     
  4. Gordyola

    Gordyola

    Joined:
    8 Jul 2007
    Messages:
    4,459
    Location:
    Manchester
    Team supported:
    City of course
    Swales plan was to have executive boxes hanging from the main stand roof but it was scuppered by fire regs, probably never had the money anyhow

    I’ve got the plans for the development of the ground that Franny planned this before they entered into negotiations to move to Eastlands
    Will dig then out and get them scanned
     
  5. Keeper!

    Keeper!

    Joined:
    21 Aug 2014
    Messages:
    2,023
    I was lucky enough to get to see a artistic impression and plans shown to me by an ex Chief Ex' of a new stadium to be built at our present site, that was stunning, but sadly don't think we will ever get to build it, partly because of issues with Sport England.
     
  6. Bobbyespania

    Bobbyespania

    Joined:
    13 Jan 2017
    Messages:
    218
    Could you post a picture?
     
  7. spiny

    spiny

    Joined:
    5 Feb 2010
    Messages:
    374
    Sport England have their own agenda re the Etihad. Compare how different is their approach to the London Stadium, not only given away but funding and running costs?

    In contrast, City spent a bundle on converting and improving the stadium plus paying the running costs and rent with Sport England holding a veto for any plans over GMC and City who constitute the majority interest.
     
    Keeper! likes this.
  8. JGL07

    JGL07

    Joined:
    18 Jan 2011
    Messages:
    1,609
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    Team supported:
    Manchester City/Hibernian
    The difference was that the City of Manchester stadium was built with an agreement that City would take over as tenants whereas the Olympic Stadium was built in the hope that some one would come in to use it after 2012.

    Without the deal with City, the City of Manchester Stadium would never have been built, at least in the form that it was.

    The Olympic Stadium was there with the terms of being available for Athletics meetings. Spurs would have bid for it but wanted to bulldoze the whole thing and start again. This was vetoed leaving West Ham as the only feasible bidder (Orient aside!) Hence West Ham could name their terms.
     
    valleyblue likes this.
  9. chesterbells

    chesterbells

    Joined:
    15 Apr 2010
    Messages:
    7,720
    Boris economics
     
  10. spiny

    spiny

    Joined:
    5 Feb 2010
    Messages:
    374
    Absolutely correct ...
    .. and is why Sport England should butt out. They have nothing to offer and have shown their incompetence.
    The subsequent investment by ADUG is beyond anything that was envisaged, without Sport England having to pay a penny. IMHO they should be reimbursed and Manchester City with their partnership with Manchester Council, allowed to develop the ground and collar site as they deem fit even if it includes a new stadium.
     
    Last edited: 17 Nov 2019

Share This Page