I think my biggest worry is that a vote to stay in will be seen as a mandate in favour of yet more integration.
It's not a worry, it's a probable fact until the whole lot implodes.
I think my biggest worry is that a vote to stay in will be seen as a mandate in favour of yet more integration.
If ever a post hit home as to the true picture of whats facing us its the above from yphrunts.
Pay no heed to the liars with an agenda, use your own judgement on the points made in this excellent post, because its you and yours that will have to live with the result, not call me Dave or the head of some organisation or other.
Hope it's cosy in that cell ;). Here's the deal, you give me 2 grand and I'll give you 1 grand back. I'll tell you what to spend it on and I'll insist you tell everyone this money came from me. As you are so fond of the EU I'm sure you'll be up for it.
David Cameron is in favour of Turkey joining the EU.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/201...-opening-uk-border-to-75-million-more-people/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...-Turkey-to-join-EU-despite-migrant-fears.html
Turkey's government has just taken over a newspaper and forced it to print pro-government views.
And it borders Syria, so no more need for those rickety boats for economic migrants to reach the EU and possible access to our benefits system, health service, schools and housing.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/gr...-will-humiliate-the-eu-again#comment-70074006
A vote to remain in the EU is a vote for Cameron, a vote for Turkey to join the EU, a vote for TTIP and a vote that zero hours contracts, poverty pay imposing big business would just love you to cast.
Whilst I concur with the sentiment and many of the points raised in yphrunts post it galls me to think it was someone as hideous as Katie Hopkins that penned it - correct me if I'm wrong.If ever a post hit home as to the true picture of whats facing us its the above from yphrunts.
Pay no heed to the liars with an agenda, use your own judgement on the points made in this excellent post, because its you and yours that will have to live with the result, not call me Dave or the head of some organisation or other.
yeah quite agree, apart from the fact that nearly everything in the Hopkins diatribe is factually incorrect and the incoherent ramblings of a racist woman writing for gobshite 'man in the pub' who actually swallows up this shit
think for yourself or think like a Hopkins?
How many times do we hear of services being cut because of a shortage of a few million pounds?
Libraries, care for the elderly and children's centres are just some examples.
Yet we send a staggering £23 million per day to Brussels, and that money of ours is spent on foreigners who are not homeless or starving like some poor people in Africa, but living perfectly adequate lives with housing, enough to eat, electricity and gas, cars and mobile phones.
So overall we paid in £8.5 billion more than we got back, or £23 million a day.
https://fullfact.org/economy/our-eu-membership-fee-55-million/
Eleven days of that could stop all these cuts in Manchester -
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co...-news/new-council-cuts-nearly-quarter-9931535
Vote Leave so our money is spent here and not on people abroad who don't really need it.
Still doesn't take into consideration the benefits of being in the single market ( Tax, free trade, ease of trade in Europe, boosts to business because of those thing etc etc) mostly because those are very difficult to calculate, its just the rebates given by default.
Still doesn't take into consideration the benefits of being in the single market ( Tax, free trade, ease of trade in Europe, boosts to business because of those thing etc etc) mostly because those are very difficult to calculate, its just the rebates given by default.
I see it as the In campaign's duty to provide us with those benefits quantified. How else am I meant to judge the 'boost to business' and compare that to our cost of membership? How do I know that there's even a benefit there in the first place?
Hard to quantify indeed, but there are non-EU countries paying into the EU to be part of the market so its safe to assume some benefit does exist? Unless those Norwegians are just charitable of course
The in campaign has released plenty of information about the benefits of EU membership, because you don't believe any of it doesn't mean they haven't provided any does it?