GMM said:bluemoon05 said:Celtic and Rangers? Bahahaha
Is it better to have wealthy neo-rich clubs with no European track record worth talking about (like, erm, City) or traditionally well supported clubs who have contributed significantly to European football like Celtic, Rangers, and a good few French, Dutch, and Portuguese sides?
If you use wealth alone as criteria for inclusion in any future Ero competition then you are eliminating competition and creating a stale hegemony for the future.
Whats wrong with that? Celtic Park is notoriously difficult for even the best teams in Europe to get a win at. And they're not exactly poor clubs either, well, Celtic isnt in any debt, its quite rich, it doesnt spend a lot of money on players because certain players arent attracted to Scottish football, not Celtic FC.bluemoon05 said:Celtic and Rangers? Bahahaha
GMM said:bluemoon05 said:Celtic and Rangers? Bahahaha
Is it better to have wealthy neo-rich clubs with no European track record worth talking about (like, erm, City) or traditionally well supported clubs who have contributed significantly to European football like Celtic, Rangers, and a good few French, Dutch, and Portuguese sides?
If you use wealth alone as criteria for inclusion in any future Ero competition then you are eliminating competition and creating a stale hegemony for the future.