A
A
Anonymous
Guest
If City ever were to join the European Super League i would go watch a local club or take up gardening.
mansour's tow ropes said:if its wealthiest we would be in wouldnt we?
bluemoondays said:GMM said:bluemoon05 said:Celtic and Rangers? Bahahaha
Is it better to have wealthy neo-rich clubs with no European track record worth talking about (like, erm, City) or traditionally well supported clubs who have contributed significantly to European football like Celtic, Rangers, and a good few French, Dutch, and Portuguese sides?
If you use wealth alone as criteria for inclusion in any future Ero competition then you are eliminating competition and creating a stale hegemony for the future.
RAG, if you use a clubs previous European track record to determine who should compete in this league then you are preventing any other club from building up a European history of any sort. All you have then is the same teams always competing for the "European Trophy" which is exactly what eliminating competition is about, that then becomes like the Yank "World Series" when only one country in the world plays the fucking game...........
"Contributed significantly to European football" - what a load of bollocks, Celtic and Rangers have been in a European competition virtually every year since they started because they play in a 2 horse mickey mouse league. In all that fucking time they have won 2 cups between them and there are plenty of other no-mark clubs that regularly appear in the CL because of other mickey mouse leagues just to make up the numbers so the big 8 (or so) get to regularly feed at the CL trough.
If you want to put in clubs with a good European record then Notts Forest should be in there, no fucking way will that happen.....
Immaculate Pasta said:If City ever were to join the European Super League i would go watch a local club or take up gardening.