HarrytheBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2011
- Messages
- 3,532
So?
So?
I thought the same, Everton have spent millions over the last few seasons and last night were just a Stoke throw back.I had Ancelotti up there with the best but was so disappointed with his tactics yesterday. Negative, overly physical with Richarlison again highlighting all that is bad in modern football, ironically there is a great player in there if he just played to his strengths dropped the dark arts crap. Delighted we beat them particularly after their classless press release following the cancellation of our premier league match following our COVID outbreak.
InbalotellibleIncredible?
Inedible?
people moaning about evertons tatics dont seem to realise carlo is an italian.famous for ultra defensive and hard to break down sides through the ages.i dont blame sides for not trying to take us on even if its tedious at times.the only thing i will say the teams who do try and have a go do seem to have more success against us even though not many beat us
Called it in the corruption thread. They completely altered the narrative with that highlight package last night. What they showed was not a true reflection of the game, and whilst it doesn't really effect us (you could maybe argue that it doesn't do us any favour commercially) it does demonstrate that the BBC far from impartial.The BBC edited did well to maximise Everton’s 26 per cent possession to make it look like an even contest. In fact it looked like Everton dominated the first half - which they clearly did not.
It's only as bad as the media (Sky/BBC/BT) prior to VAR. Look how many times they would show certain incidents on a loop (Aguero on Winston Reid being the prime example) in the highlights package, yet not even show certain incidents.
I've lost count of the amount of times MOTD would cobble their highlights package together to show a game where City won by the odd goal but battered the opposition, and they make it look like we were really luck to 'scrape' a win.