Every player to Chelsea

Players can sign for other clubs if they have a buy back clause. Unless you think his only two options are to stay st Southampton until he retires or rejoin City?

No not at all.
But surely there are clauses written in the contract?
And seeing as we have a £40m buy back..who gets the extra £10m?
 
Just read that myself,they have no idea them idiots at all,absolutely desperate
They have to be funded by dodgy money, no one with any sense does what they are doing, Roman had billions to spend, but he spent it well , he had a very different business model to ourselves but it was hugely successful to him and Chelsea.
 
They have to be funded by dodgy money, no one with any sense does what they are doing, Roman had billions to spend, but he spent it well , he had a very different business model to ourselves but it was hugely successful to him and Chelsea.

Yanks for you though,spend spend spend,even them moaning bastards across the way always find some big money every transfer window,yet are meant to be so much in debt.

Gamblers,simple form of gambling,chuck loads of money at it,and might eventually get a decent return,and if it doesn't..................well chuck some more at it.
 
Yanks for you though,spend spend spend,even them moaning bastards across the way always find some big money every transfer window,yet are meant to be so much in debt.

Gamblers,simple form of gambling,chuck loads of money at it,and might eventually get a decent return,and if it doesn't..................well chuck some more at it.
The leader of the world, the ones that can do no wrong and the bastards who will try and destroy the beautiful game, I hate yanks and their "culture" with a passion.
 
No not at all.
But surely there are clauses written in the contract?
And seeing as we have a £40m buy back..who gets the extra £10m?

Southampton do, he’s their player! Presumably we have a first refusal, so if Southampton did accept Chelsea’s bid we would have the option to bid £40 million for him. But even if we did, it’s unlikely that Lavia would have come back here anyway
 
But surely there are clauses written in the contract?
And seeing as we have a £40m buy back..who gets the extra £10m?
That £10m is a bit of a red herring.
If Chelsea buy him directly from Southampton for £50 m, Southampton get the £50m minus any sell on clause that goes to us.

Sell on clause and buy back clauses are generally arranged so that the end financial result is similar.
 
It's straight forward really. If Chelsea bid and Southampton accept, we're then notified and can bid the pre-agreed amount which Southampton must accept. It then comes down to the player whether he wants to return to us or join Chelsea.
 
I would imagine we would use our buyback clause, and either keep him or sell him for the higher amount.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.