evolution now to be taught in primary schools

tonea2003

Well-Known Member
Joined
6 Jul 2007
Messages
22,896
Location
jeopardy
<a class="postlink" href="https://humanism.org.uk/2014/09/01/evolution-now-part-english-primary-national-curriculum/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">https://humanism.org.uk/2014/09/01/evol ... urriculum/</a>

Evolution now part of the English primary national curriculum
September 1st, 2014



Email
Today sees a new national curriculum in English schools come into force, and for the first time this includes a module on evolution in primary schools. The module on evolution and inheritance is part of the year six programme of study (ages 10-11). The British Humanist Association (BHA) has long campaigned for such a change, and has welcomed another of its goals being realised.

In 2011 the BHA launched the ‘Teach evolution, not creationism!’ campaign, with support from four organisations including the British Science Association and the Association for Science Education, and from 30 leading scientists including three Nobel prize winners, Sir David Attenborough, Richard Dawkins and Michael Reiss. That campaign had two simple goals: to see new rules introduced to ensure that creationism and intelligent design ‘may not be presented as scientific theories in any publicly-funded school of whatever type’, and to see evolution added to the primary national curriculum instead of being taught from year ten (ages 14-15).

The first of those goals was realised in June 2014, and the second has now been realised as well. The current year six will be taught the old programme of study, with the new programme of study being taught from September 2015.

BHA Education Campaigner Richy Thompson commented, ‘Scientists and educators have long told us that evolution is such a central idea to biology that it should be taught from a primary level instead of at GCSE. It is vital that every young person has a good understanding of how life came to be and we are pleased that today’s changes mean that from now on, young people will have more opportunities to learn about such an important topic and from an earlier age at that. We’re pleased to see the fulfilment today of our decade-long campaign.’

Notes

For further comment or information, please contact Richy Thompson at richy@humanism.org.uk or on 078155 89 636.

Read the ‘Teach evolution, not creationism!’ statement, coordinated by the BHA, from 30 scientists including Sir David Attenborough, Professor Richard Dawkins, Sir Paul Nurse and Professor Michael Reiss, the Association for Science Education, the British Science Association, the Campaign for Science and Engineering and Ekklesia at <a class="postlink" href="http://evolutionnotcreationism.org.uk/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://evolutionnotcreationism.org.uk/</a>

Read more about the BHA’s work on ‘faith’ schools: <a class="postlink" href="https://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/schools-and-education/faith-schools/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">https://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/schoo ... h-schools/</a>

Read more about the BHA’s campaigns work on science, evolution and creationism: <a class="postlink" href="https://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/schools-and-education/school-curriculum/science-evolution-and-creationism/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">https://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/schoo ... eationism/</a>

The British Humanist Association is the national charity working on behalf of non-religious people who seek to live ethical and fulfilling lives on the basis of reason and humanity. It promotes a secular state and equal treatment in law and policy of everyone, regardless of religion or belief.
 
i am a biologist and the only objection i have is that its quite a difficult concept and will be hard to teach well to primary school kids
 
pirate said:
i am a biologist and the only objection i have is that its quite a difficult concept and will be hard to teach well to primary school kids

Don't see how it's hard ...

Look kids. Get the telescope out 'You used to be little bacteria'... Then the earth got some water ... So the bacteria turned into fish ... Then some of the fish wanted to play on the land so over time there legs and arms developed ... Then some lived in the trees .. Then some monkey humans travelled up north to Manchester area and never really developed.
 
Markt85 said:
pirate said:
i am a biologist and the only objection i have is that its quite a difficult concept and will be hard to teach well to primary school kids

Don't see how it's hard ...

Look kids. Get the telescope out 'You used to be little bacteria'... Then the earth got some water ... So the bacteria turned into fish ... Then some of the fish wanted to play on the land so over time there legs and arms developed ... Then some lived in the trees .. Then some monkey humans travelled up north to Manchester area and never really developed.

.... And sometimes living organisms mutate into barely recognisable variants of their species, sometimes regressing into knuckle-dragging, unibrowed, barely literate, lazy, aggressive, unintelligent fucktards who don't know the difference between a telescope and a microscope. We call these, "West Ham Supporting Cockney Slags".

Now, fuck off back to Billingsgate Market and stick some of them fucking eels up your arse while you wank yourself into a frenzy over a picture of Dot Cotton, you slaaaaag.

(We love ya really Mark :) )
 
it is just as important that creationism is not taught as fact to young and impressionable minds,

by all means it can be used in a historical sense that it was once thought....etc
 
stonerblue said:
pirate said:
i am a biologist and the only objection i have is that its quite a difficult concept and will be hard to teach well to primary school kids

slightly less difficult to understand than immaculate conception though

Not sure, fairy tales are allowed to be more ambiguous than facts
 
Hamann Pineapple said:
stonerblue said:
pirate said:
i am a biologist and the only objection i have is that its quite a difficult concept and will be hard to teach well to primary school kids

slightly less difficult to understand than immaculate conception though

Not sure, fairy tales are allowed to be more ambiguous than facts

and that is the biggest fairy tale of them all
 
CTID1988 said:
They dont teach it already?!

im quite sure we were taught it in the 70s, the evolution chart doing the rounds seems to ring a bell from school, but there is a lot of water under the bridge since then, i have forgot more than i know
 
marco said:
CTID1988 said:
They dont teach it already?!

im quite sure we were taught it in the 70s, the evolution chart doing the rounds seems to ring a bell from school, but there is a lot of water under the bridge since then, i have forgot more than i know

in secondary schools maybe but not primary
 
Now if only they would stop this bullshit next.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.change.org/p/end-compulsory-worship-in-schools" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.change.org/p/end-compulsory- ... in-schools</a>
 
My 8 year old daughters class spent a term last year learning about Charles Darwin, however, I'm not so sure this would happen in a faith school.
 
Markt85 said:
pirate said:
i am a biologist and the only objection i have is that its quite a difficult concept and will be hard to teach well to primary school kids

Don't see how it's hard ...

Look kids. Get the telescope out 'You used to be little bacteria'... Then the earth got some water ... So the bacteria turned into fish ... Then some of the fish wanted to play on the land so over time there legs and arms developed ... Then some lived in the trees .. Then some monkey humans travelled up north to Manchester area and never really developed.

It's always lovely when a smart-arse tries something like this but fucks up so comprehensively that nothing needs to be added other than the use of the 'bold' function.
 
BWTAC said:
My 8 year old daughters class spent a term last year learning about Charles Darwin, however, I'm not so sure this would happen in a faith school.

they have to now, well from sept 2015
 
tonea2003 said:
BWTAC said:
My 8 year old daughters class spent a term last year learning about Charles Darwin, however, I'm not so sure this would happen in a faith school.

they have to now, well from sept 2015

And so they should, at my daughters school, they learn about different faiths and cultures, perhaps making younger children more aware and not being made to be pigeonholed may make way for more of a rounded and tolerant older individual?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top