Postman Pep
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2018
- Messages
- 5,081
no idea but they announced that he'd agreed to contributeso is it the lads at 93.20 podcast who filmed him ??
Then earlier in the week said they'd rescheduled
no idea but they announced that he'd agreed to contributeso is it the lads at 93.20 podcast who filmed him ??
You ok mate?Plane crashes onto an island
survival, polar bears, the others, fat guy
Purgatory - the end
Yup
no idea but they announced that he'd agreed to contribute
Then earlier in the week said they'd rescheduled
so is it the lads at 93.20 podcast who filmed him ??
no idea but they announced that he'd agreed to contribute
Then earlier in the week said they'd rescheduled
Maybe I'm naive but I agree.with you. Why would a blue want to bite the hand that feeds them so to speak. I dont get it, maybe someone masquerading as a blue reeled him in. Maybe that fraud is an associate of one of the journos. it's not like they would do it directly because 1. They are spineless cowards. 2. They dont want to be directly implicated? It's not like these low lifes dont know a few people. I mean how else do they 'source' the inside track on stories. How do we know the News of the world phone hacking hasn't developed over the years. It's all speculation I know but its plausible. Best thing is for Rabin to report it to the police and take it from there. Hes being blackmailed and now an audience of lord knows how many on here know about it. Who's to say one of us isn't a copper and is duty bound to investigate it further. Anyway one way or another the truth will out. It invariably always does.Don't understand , if true, is why a City fan would do this .
I was just about to say someone ask him@BillyShears I’m sure can clear that up.
True, he did say he respected the person he was having a Skype call with also.Rabin said yesterday that he'd agreed to do an interview for a podcast that never took place because they were never able to agree a mutually convenient time. That was 93:20, I strongly suspect. And when they were discussing it with him, they clearly indicated that it would be a phone rather than a video chat, and were even prepared to use software to disguise his voice. So IMO pretty unlikely to be them given that the conversation seems never to have taken place and they were absolutely on board with protecting his anonymity if it had.