Exposing the hypocrisy of journalists

What was the intention of the person filming him? To release it as a scoop for their channel or just so they can brag about to their mates? Even though it's a bit of a ****'s trick, it's a little easier to forgive than refusing to delete it after you've specifically been asked to.
 
so is it the lads at 93.20 podcast who filmed him ??

Rabin said yesterday that he'd agreed to do an interview for a podcast that never took place because they were never able to agree a mutually convenient time. That was 93:20, I strongly suspect. And when they were discussing it with him, they clearly indicated that it would be a phone rather than a video chat, and were even prepared to use software to disguise his voice. So IMO pretty unlikely to be them given that the conversation seems never to have taken place and they were absolutely on board with protecting his anonymity if it had.
 
Don't understand , if true, is why a City fan would do this .
Maybe I'm naive but I agree.with you. Why would a blue want to bite the hand that feeds them so to speak. I dont get it, maybe someone masquerading as a blue reeled him in. Maybe that fraud is an associate of one of the journos. it's not like they would do it directly because 1. They are spineless cowards. 2. They dont want to be directly implicated? It's not like these low lifes dont know a few people. I mean how else do they 'source' the inside track on stories. How do we know the News of the world phone hacking hasn't developed over the years. It's all speculation I know but its plausible. Best thing is for Rabin to report it to the police and take it from there. Hes being blackmailed and now an audience of lord knows how many on here know about it. Who's to say one of us isn't a copper and is duty bound to investigate it further. Anyway one way or another the truth will out. It invariably always does.
 
Rabin said yesterday that he'd agreed to do an interview for a podcast that never took place because they were never able to agree a mutually convenient time. That was 93:20, I strongly suspect. And when they were discussing it with him, they clearly indicated that it would be a phone rather than a video chat, and were even prepared to use software to disguise his voice. So IMO pretty unlikely to be them given that the conversation seems never to have taken place and they were absolutely on board with protecting his anonymity if it had.
True, he did say he respected the person he was having a Skype call with also.

 
Surely we could ask Der Spiegel and Wiki leaks to hack an account, release the name to Rick Parry who will then inform the NYT who will refer it to UEFA who will then charge us for breaching confidentiality. We will then appeal to CAS and we will know the culprit around March 2020.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.