FA considering charging Mancini but guess what.....

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

I reckon there is a case for saying that what Taggart did on Boxing Day is different in substance from what Mancini and Redknapp said. What he did and said to Mike Dean, the fourth official and the linesman (even though he actually ruled the goal out) was disgraceful, but if it did not form part of Dean's report then under their own rules there is little the FA can do about it.

Last week, however, after the Swansea game, Taggart was hyper-critical of Michael Oliver, questioning his capabilities. He also accused a Premier League footballer of intentionally assaulting one of his own players. A very serious allegation. These comments took place in exactly the same forum as Mancini's and Redknapp's so there is no procedural reason to differentiate each matter. He clearly has as much of a case to answer as the other two at the very least.

The way that the press and the FA have been brought to heel by this bully is an absolute fucking disgrace and like all bullies he'll keep doing it if they don't stand up to him, which they won't.

Absolutely disgraceful.

Did Balotelli's 'stamp' form part of the ref's report, did Crappenberg include the details of Adebayor kicking Dick v Miffy in the head, was the Rooney elbow on McCarthy in the ref's report, and did the FArce intervene when Thatcher shouldered Mendes into the hoardings? The FArce make up the rules as they go along. They quote the rules when they don't want to take action. When they do want to take action they quote their usual crap about bringing the game into disprepute.

They are a bunch of snivelling cowards who are only concerned with parking their arses on first class seats. They don't give a stuff for the fans unless they want to sell 'em a ticket for a third class England team.

 

[Bluemanc100]

I reckon there is a case for saying that what Taggart did on Boxing Day is different in substance from what Mancini and Redknapp said. What he did and said to Mike Dean, the fourth official and the linesman (even though he actually ruled the goal out) was disgraceful, but if it did not form part of Dean's report then under their own rules there is little the FA can do about it.

Last week, however, after the Swansea game, Taggart was hyper-critical of Michael Oliver, questioning his capabilities. He also accused a Premier League footballer of intentionally assaulting one of his own players. A very serious allegation. These comments took place in exactly the same forum as Mancini's and Redknapp's so there is no procedural reason to differentiate each matter. He clearly has as much of a case to answer as the other two at the very least.

The way that the press and the FA have been brought to heel by this bully is an absolute fucking disgrace and like all bullies he'll keep doing it if they don't stand up to him, which they won't.

Absolutely disgraceful.

Did Balotelli's 'stamp' form part of the ref's report, did Crappenberg include the details of Adebayor kicking Dick v Miffy in the head, was the Rooney elbow on McCarthy in the ref's report, and did the FArce intervene when Thatcher shouldered Mendes into the hoardings? The FArce make up the rules as they go along. They quote the rules when they don't want to take action. When they do want to take action they quote their usual crap about bringing the game into disprepute.

They are a bunch of snivelling cowards who are only concerned with parking their arses on first class seats. They don't give a stuff for the fans unless they want to sell 'em a ticket for a third class England team.

Post of the day my friend, we're all ranting about this and nothing is going to happen

 

[Nascent Blues]

I knew that old **** wouldn't be charged. But I'll be firmly in the agenda camp if Mancini is.

Welcome, AlthamBlue, welcome to the fastest growing camp since the Normandy invasion!

All you anti-agenda wallahs - is there any other evidence, occurence, incident you wish to put forward that will indicate that every team, player, and manager is treated equally by the FArce!

Wenger gets done for kicking a bottle, Mancini and Redknapp are to be done for pointing out the blatant incompetence of a referee, Mancini in a smiling, huggable way, Redknapp with a little bit of amateur dramatics but ThePurpleNosedTosser harangues a referee in a manner that had it been Gareth Barry on the pitch he would have been sent off. The FArce do not work in mysterious ways, they work in the most corrupt of ways!

But it isn't just this; it's the fact that after the game - when being interviewed just like Mancini and Deputy Dog - the horrible bastard criticised Oliver's refereeing, calling into question his age and performance. How is this any different from Mancini and Deputy Dog,?

We are not in realms of subjectivity here; it's an open and shut case.

And for the FA to ignore the old pisscan one week and lay the tracks to be able to charge two managers the folowing week just stands to highlight how utterly fucking bent they are.

 

[Blue Oak]

Heard Fergie saying on the radio that Pardew has forgotten all what Fergie has done for him.
I'll be honest, I haven't a scooby what he's on about but what a sanctimonious ****. God we need to kick on and shut them up.

 

[BlueMoonoverUS]

Well off the topic kind of but I didn't really like Kompany and Yaya running their mouth and complaining to the referee last game. It looks bad plus it can get them and club in a trouble. Foul has been given (or not) and there's no way ref's going to change it just because they are complaining about it.

 

[blueinsa]

I reckon there is a case for saying that what Taggart did on Boxing Day is different in substance from what Mancini and Redknapp said. What he did and said to Mike Dean, the fourth official and the linesman (even though he actually ruled the goal out) was disgraceful, but if it did not form part of Dean's report then under their own rules there is little the FA can do about it.

Last week, however, after the Swansea game, Taggart was hyper-critical of Michael Oliver, questioning his capabilities. He also accused a Premier League footballer of intentionally assaulting one of his own players. A very serious allegation. These comments took place in exactly the same forum as Mancini's and Redknapp's so there is no procedural reason to differentiate each matter. He clearly has as much of a case to answer as the other two at the very least.

The way that the press and the FA have been brought to heel by this bully is an absolute fucking disgrace and like all bullies he'll keep doing it if they don't stand up to him, which they won't.

Absolutely disgraceful.

Did Balotelli's 'stamp' form part of the ref's report, did Crappenberg include the details of Adebayor kicking Dick v Miffy in the head, was the Rooney elbow on McCarthy in the ref's report, and did the FArce intervene when Thatcher shouldered Mendes into the hoardings? The FArce make up the rules as they go along. They quote the rules when they don't want to take action. When they do want to take action they quote their usual crap about bringing the game into disprepute.

They are a bunch of snivelling cowards who are only concerned with parking their arses on first class seats. They don't give a stuff for the fans unless they want to sell 'em a ticket for a third class England team.

 

[Blue2112]

Well off the topic kind of but I didn't really like Kompany and Yaya running their mouth and complaining to the referee last game. It looks bad plus it can get them and club in a trouble. Foul has been given (or not) and there's no way ref's going to change it just because they are complaining about it.

Yaya does this all the time. You'd think a player of his calibre would know better and be an example to others.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I reckon there is a case for saying that what Taggart did on Boxing Day is different in substance from what Mancini and Redknapp said. What he did and said to Mike Dean, the fourth official and the linesman (even though he actually ruled the goal out) was disgraceful, but if it did not form part of Dean's report then under their own rules there is little the FA can do about it.

Last week, however, after the Swansea game, Taggart was hyper-critical of Michael Oliver, questioning his capabilities. He also accused a Premier League footballer of intentionally assaulting one of his own players. A very serious allegation. These comments took place in exactly the same forum as Mancini's and Redknapp's so there is no procedural reason to differentiate each matter. He clearly has as much of a case to answer as the other two at the very least.

The way that the press and the FA have been brought to heel by this bully is an absolute fucking disgrace and like all bullies he'll keep doing it if they don't stand up to him, which they won't.

Absolutely disgraceful.

Did Balotelli's 'stamp' form part of the ref's report, did Crappenberg include the details of Adebayor kicking Dick v Miffy in the head, was the Rooney elbow on McCarthy in the ref's report, and did the FArce intervene when Thatcher shouldered Mendes into the hoardings? The FArce make up the rules as they go along. They quote the rules when they don't want to take action. When they do want to take action they quote their usual crap about bringing the game into disprepute.

They are a bunch of snivelling cowards who are only concerned with parking their arses on first class seats. They don't give a stuff for the fans unless they want to sell 'em a ticket for a third class England team.

I take your point, but I stand by mine.

Even if you allow for the fact that the incidents on Boxing Day were different, what Ferguson said after the Swansea game was the same in substance as Mancini and Redknapp after their games on Wednesday and moreover what Ferguson said went further imo.

 

[blueinsa]

Well off the topic kind of but I didn't really like Kompany and Yaya running their mouth and complaining to the referee last game. It looks bad plus it can get them and club in a trouble. Foul has been given (or not) and there's no way ref's going to change it just because they are complaining about it.

Yaya does this all the time. You'd think a player of his calibre would know better and be an example to others.

Problem again the mate is Yaya does it and its a disgrace, Wazza does it and its passion!

The double standards applied by both media and governing bodies is an absolute disgrace.

Whats good for the goose and all that....

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Well off the topic kind of but I didn't really like Kompany and Yaya running their mouth and complaining to the referee last game. It looks bad plus it can get them and club in a trouble. Foul has been given (or not) and there's no way ref's going to change it just because they are complaining about it.

Once the ref has given the foul, we await the free kick but not until Kompany or Yaya has been booked for dissent. Meanwhile, over at The Swamp eight or nine Rags are haranguing the ref whose cards remain firmly stitched into the lining of his shorts!