manchester blue said:Anyone who believes there is no corruption in football in naïve in the extreme. It exists in every other business so why not in one of the richest in the world? It happens in Europe so why not in the UK?
The Adebayor trial for his celebration is proof enough. The referee pointed to the away fans when he booked him. How could he be booked for time wasting when he got back into his own half quicker that anyone in history. And why have other players who have taken longer to get back not been booked since. That witch hunt by the FA stunk the place out.
As PB pointed out why was SWP done for the slightest movement of his foot when he had just been flattened and then had a football booted into his stomach from point blank range? I actually think City are as much to blame City for this. They should have laid one of the FA board [Gill would do] on the floor, booted a ball at him from point blank range and if he moved even slightly SWP gets off. It’s funny that the referee didn’t see this when he was three metres away. It’s also funny that every time Ronaldo did it the referee saw it. And for him to get the same ban as the Stoke player is incredible. The FA will get away with favouring the big teams by using the “referee saw it and didn’t deem it worthy” rule as they did twice with starfish Gerrard.
Blue Tones – I fail to see how the FA cannot claim a conflict of interest when a CEO of a member club sits on their board. They have never given a satisfactory answer to this question. Because they can’t.
then surely if we follwo you chain of thought ..with City being the richest club in the world then the club should be at the head of the Que when it comes to handing out backhanders for results and decisions?..
see there is a point of view that could be argued by every other club bar city ...