Lavinda Past
Well-Known Member
Linesman is a yard behind the red line in the picture.And it would have shown the player was onside
Linesman is a yard behind the red line in the picture.And it would have shown the player was onside
He is looking down at Traore as he stamps on his face , what a f*cking cowardI hope someone breaks Robertson's foot, the **** knew exactly what he was doing.
The whatsapp group will have been lit up tonightI don’t think I’ve ever heard any officials decision supported with ‘he’s very experienced’ and yet I’ve heard it 3 times now, all I connection with this game. It’s all a bit weird.
This argument could be used all the time. There may be no camera angle showing offside because it was not offside.Simple Simon has the answer:
Why Wolves' goal was disallowed
Liverpool 2-2 Wolves
Simon Stone
BBC Sport
To be clear, the Wolves (third) disallowed goal was due to (very experienced) assistant flagging for offside against corner taker when ball was returned to him.
There was no camera angle available with any evidence to overturn decision.
If Robertson wasnt cautioned there should be retrospective action , they did to Aguero when Sky had it on a loop for 24 hours , but as per usual the Dippers will not be punished for anything , their manager gets away with encouraging coach attacks , their fans with murder and their team with blatant cheating , its the Liverpool way'Hahaha, how's he avoided a red card with that footage available, ridiculous.