FA Cup 3rd Round Games 6/7/8/9 Jan

[cheekybids]

If there was no camera angle wtf where var officials doing for two minutes while the decision was reviewed?

We will never know.

 

[BringBackSwales]

Funny the intermittent var problems that occur randomly at anfield, like when TAA played basketball in his own area, like the no offside lines for Salah, and so on. Obviously just a coincidence that it always benefits them

 

[Bantamgaz]

If there was no camera angle wtf where var officials doing for two minutes while the decision was reviewed?

Destroying the evidence ???
Pulling the plug on the camera????
Finding an excuse to disallow the goal ????

Fooking Mike Dean on duty is fooking laughable anyhow ????
The same Mike Dean who is a Tranmere fan ????
The same Mike dean that lives on the Wirral which neighbours that slum ????
Fook me he should have been the last person to be on that VAR studio
You really think he was ever gonna let a decision stand based on what them twats are like ?????

 

[manimanc]

Simple Simon has the answer:

Why Wolves' goal was disallowed​

Liverpool 2-2 Wolves

Simon Stone
BBC Sport
To be clear, the Wolves (third) disallowed goal was due to (very experienced) assistant flagging for offside against corner taker when ball was returned to him.
There was no camera angle available with any evidence to overturn decision.

What the fuck does this simple croaky rag prick know?

 

[gingerprince]

I'm pretty sure from highlights he wasn't offside.


If you freeze frame when it was headed by the

Wolves player to the corner kick taker, Tront is

at the far post and only 2.5 yards from goaline

playing him on undoubtedly as Allison behind

in the goal.

Lino can just put his flag up,,its worth a shot

if he knows that area doesn't have VAR and

he's not going to be overuled..open to abuse,

Should never have that option in his pocket.

The "experienced" is not even inline with TAA

the player who plays him onside

 

[BringBackSwales]

There's a video on twitter showing the head of the wolves player just about on the screen as the wolves player heads the ball back to him and from that video/angle, he's well onside...





There's also a video of the referee pointing at the linesman just after the ball goes in the net, "possibly" telling the linesman to put his flag up?

Madley cheats week in and week out, it’s blatant

 

[Lavinda Past]

Moving on from the VARless game we just watched, I have to say, I don't think I've seen such an entertaining 3rd round for some years.
With the obvious exception of the dickhead commentators and pundits, the telly coverage has been really good today.

 

[Plays By Sense Of Smell]

Simple Simon has the answer:

Why Wolves' goal was disallowed​

Liverpool 2-2 Wolves

Simon Stone
BBC Sport
To be clear, the Wolves (third) disallowed goal was due to (very experienced) assistant flagging for offside against corner taker when ball was returned to him.
There was no camera angle available with any evidence to overturn decision.

This would justify a situation whereby incredibly bent decisions can be made all night long and stand, just because there was no evidence to the contrary...except the evidence everyone saw at the time.

Luckily, that ridiculously contrived scenario would never actually hap..

Oh,...

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

Wolves were absolutley robbed , the Salah goal is simply offside irrespective of the Wolves player touching the ball , when the ball was crossed Salah was yards offside , and the fact they cannot find a camera angle for the 2nd dubious decision is a load of bollocks , they have the angle but it doesnt suit the F.A. for the holders and a big name to go out in the 3rd round.
Decisions like this only prove how the Premier league and F.A, are quite willing to bend the rules for the red 'istree clubs , it f*cking stinks and happens on a weekly basis , its about time referee's served long term bans for performances like tonight he gave the Dippers everything .Really hope justice is done and Wolves smash them a Molyneux , but they will have to beat PGMOL ,F.A. and even the Premier league to do so , just like we have for the last dozen years.

 

[Bantamgaz]

I'm pretty sure from highlights he wasn't offside.


If you freeze frame when it was headed by the

Wolves player to the corner kick taker, Tront is

at the far post and only 2.5 yards from goaline

playing him on undoubtedly as Allison behind

in the goal.

Lino can just put his flag up,,its worth a shot

if he knows that area doesn't have VAR and

he's not going to be overuled..open to abuse,

Should never have that option in his pocket

He could have been 10 yards onside but they would have found a way to chalk it off ............ did you see the foul on Traore at the end ?????? And he didn’t even give that :( seriously the media will just back them up because they are to scared to do anything about it :(

 

[Lavinda Past]

And it would have shown the player was onside

Linesman is a yard behind the red line in the picture.

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

I hope someone breaks Robertson's foot, the **** knew exactly what he was doing.

He is looking down at Traore as he stamps on his face , what a f*cking coward

 

[Bluearmy]

I don’t think I’ve ever heard any officials decision supported with ‘he’s very experienced’ and yet I’ve heard it 3 times now, all I connection with this game. It’s all a bit weird.

The whatsapp group will have been lit up tonight

 

[Indaparkside]

Justice for the 11

 

[Tommy_Catons_Perm]

Simple Simon has the answer:

Why Wolves' goal was disallowed​

Liverpool 2-2 Wolves

Simon Stone
BBC Sport
To be clear, the Wolves (third) disallowed goal was due to (very experienced) assistant flagging for offside against corner taker when ball was returned to him.
There was no camera angle available with any evidence to overturn decision.

This argument could be used all the time. There may be no camera angle showing offside because it was not offside.

If it's not offside then a camera angle showing offside will not exist, irrespective of how many cameras there are.

 

[Thornliebank]

Liverpool will probably scud them 4-0 in the replay.

 

[Otamendi's Beard]

Joke officials tonight. Clear bias for the Scouse shite and VAR just as bad.

 

[gingerprince]

Why did Madley not put his arm up for offside as soon as he looked over to the right either....?
As lino if its the corner taker knows he's offside ages ago and just awaiting for goalscoring
opportunity to end or score so he would raise it immediately? But Madley didn't raise his arm
for offside til a lot longer

 

[bluethrunthru]

As I said the Irish butt plug did eulogise over a shinner lol

 

[jimmygrimblesboots]

Hahaha, how's he avoided a red card with that footage available, ridiculous.

If Robertson wasnt cautioned there should be retrospective action , they did to Aguero when Sky had it on a loop for 24 hours , but as per usual the Dippers will not be punished for anything , their manager gets away with encouraging coach attacks , their fans with murder and their team with blatant cheating , its the Liverpool way'
European Vermin.