FA Cup 3rd Round Games 6/7/8/9 Jan

[hammocity]

Wowww new rules every fuckin week

We’ve had this type of discussion on this rule quite a few times on here.

 

[A57 the snake]

Time to watch bbc3 14th century Welsh wallpapering documentary been meaning to watch this for a while.

 

[SebastianBlue]

Stupid rule. He benefits from being in an offside position when the ball was played

Yep, because what is the defender meant to do in situations like that, let it go through hoping the opposition players are, in fact, offside?

And it’s subjective as to was it is “intentional” and “unintentional” play of the ball, which means it is yet another thing that can have very different outcomes depending on who is officiating the match.

It’s a stupid change that further disadvantages the defence.

 

[Boo or Boo-urns]

The media outrage ran for weeks when Rodri sneaked behind Mings for his goal compared to the glee when Salah runs in an offside position gaining an advantage.

 

[city saint]

thought they changed that rule after city benifited from it against villa

 

[Allnightlong]

why cant they look at it and see that there was an offisde leading up to the goal like evry other team is subjected too?

 

[Tomblue]

The rule says he is not off, so he is not. However, any other team and that would be offside no doubt.

Shambles.

 

[jimharri]

Time to watch bbc3 14th century Welsh wallpapering documentary been meaning to watch this for a while.

Any strippers on it? Asking for a friend, see?

 

[The Future’s Blue!]

Give up with this bullshit, football off.

 

[lancs blue]

Yep. If the defender hadn't touched the ball while deliberately playing the ball, Salah would have been offside. And ifthe ball had accidentally flicked off the defender, Salah would also have been offside. Same thing that covers the back pass rule.

Judging by some of the posts on here Sane's goal against Liverpool was correctly ruled out...