FA Cup 3rd Round Games 6/7/8/9 Jan

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 81382
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wolves were absolutley robbed , the Salah goal is simply offside irrespective of the Wolves player touching the ball , when the ball was crossed Salah was yards offside , and the fact they cannot find a camera angle for the 2nd dubious decision is a load of bollocks , they have the angle but it doesnt suit the F.A. for the holders and a big name to go out in the 3rd round.
Decisions like this only prove how the Premier league and F.A, are quite willing to bend the rules for the red 'istree clubs , it f*cking stinks and happens on a weekly basis , its about time referee's served long term bans for performances like tonight he gave the Dippers everything .Really hope justice is done and Wolves smash them a Molyneux , but they will have to beat PGMOL ,F.A. and even the Premier league to do so , just like we have for the last dozen years.
There are camera angles. Lots of them
 

Attachments

  • A5D38347-BEF5-474A-AD45-C08707C92E9A.jpeg
    A5D38347-BEF5-474A-AD45-C08707C92E9A.jpeg
    601.2 KB · Views: 55
Liverpool will probably scud them 4-0 in the replay.
They might but it’s 90 more minutes for the German Bitch-Machine to moan endlessly about FAC replays, which is delightful enough regardless.

Separately, I was out running errands and listened to some of this match on satellite ratio. Jesus Christ, listening to whichever two yammerers TalkSport or whatever had broadcasting was vomit-inducing. Fellating Liverpool at EVERY opportunity without criticism save for Allison. I’m still nauseous.
 
Very experienced tho
Oooh, definitely. Very, very experienced guy him. In fact, he's the best, most very experienced linesman ever.
donald-trump-short-fingered-vulgarian-fingers-bruce-handy-ss13.jpg
 
There are camera angles. Lots of them
That could be the head of an incredibly tall person in the crowd, who happens to be wearing yellow. VAR needs better evidence than that to overturn the judgement of a very, very experienced linesman.
 
Do people still wonder why they don't have video screens at Anfield and the swamp...?

That linesman is bent as a nine-bob note.
I believe this to be true.

They can build a new fuckin stand at Anfield around the existing one yet cant put a screen or cameras in!

Fuckin cunts, cheats to the core.

Once a Scouser!

You can take the the Scouser out of Liverpool etc etc (generally when they've made a few quid legitimately or more likely illegally)
 
This argument could be used all the time. There may be no camera angle showing offside because it was not offside.

If it's not offside then a camera angle showing offside will not exist, irrespective of how many cameras there are.
See this is what I don’t understand and haven’t heard the question asked. Why is there no camera angle? Is VAR implemented differently at Anfield and if so why? Surely to god every PL ground has to have a consistent implementation or teams are playing to different rules.
 


Just look at Trents position, and Nunes position when he comes in frame 0.1 seconds later. No chance he was offside, Wolves got robbed by liVARpool as so many teams have been before. Absolute joke.

This is the very first frame that shows the very top blur of the head of the corner taker (bottom red circle).

I have drawn a crude offside line (that probably favours Liverpool more than anything).

The ball is difficult to see but is in the center of the centre red circle (it is just leaving the body of a player). It is still unknown if it came off a Liverpool or a Wolves player (as we saw with the Salah goal, it is apparently impossible for the corner taker to be offside if a Liverpool player was the last to touch the ball).

Either way, it is very difficult to believe that the corner taker was offside when the ball was cleared to them.

EE8-EEE3-E-32-F8-4-A31-B08-A-CFF0-B0-CD353-C.jpg


Here are the problems with this decision and VAR:

1) because the officials are not mic’d, there is no way to know if the flag was for the corner taker or some other fabricated infringement

2) there is a bling spot for VAR at Anfield (for “reasons”) that prevented any conclusive frame from being capture that would show the exact position of the corner taker when the ball was played

3) VAR provided no evidence of who last touch the ball, which would determine if the corner taker could be offside at all

4) the linesman flagged for offside in this instance, whilst the other linesman didn’t flag for offside for the Salah goal; these decisions substantive impacted the outcome of the goals (no flag for the Wolves goal and it would have stood; a flag for the Salah goal and it wouldn’t have stood).
There are serious issues with the current officiating and VAR (especially at certain grounds like Anfield).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top