FA Cup 3rd Round Games 6/7/8/9 Jan

[Grassland Blue]

I'm pretty sure from highlights he wasn't offside.


If you freeze frame when it was headed by the

Wolves player to the corner kick taker, Tront is

at the far post and only 2.5 yards from goaline

playing him on undoubtedly as Allison behind

in the goal.

Lino can just put his flag up,,its worth a shot

if he knows that area doesn't have VAR and

he's not going to be overuled..open to abuse,

Should never have that option in his pocket.

The "experienced" is not even inline with TAA

the player who plays him onside

There seem to be a few anomalies with var, beginning with the supervisor in Stockley Park.
Some games have var and some don't.
Most grounds have big screens to show what is being debated by var, yet 2 don't. (We all know which 2 grounds those are!)
How can there be a var blind spot in any stadium and especially at a part of the pitch where an offside is very likely to occur?
VAR - a riddle, cloaked in mystery and shrouded in secrecy.

 

[Bantamgaz]

Sad thing is that this will continue to go on for years to come ........... fooking amazing what they will do to try and get these teams back to the top .......... remember the days when you actually won the league by being the best or even being higher up the table.......... now it based on how many bent decisions you can achieve in a season ........... it actually fooking sickens you that teams actually prepare right they follow a game plan to the letter but it’s all being taken away by a bunch of corrupt bastards sat in a studio :(

 

[jonah62]

She offers nothing ... wonder how she got a job

Blow

 

[Bantamgaz]

There seem to be a few anomalies with var, beginning with the supervisor in Stockley Park.
Some games have var and some don't.
Most grounds have big screens to show what is being debated by var, yet 2 don't. (We all know which 2 grounds those are!)
How can there be a var blind spot in any stadium and especially at a part of the pitch where an offside is very likely to occur?
VAR - a riddle, cloaked in mystery and shrouded in secrecy.

VAR .......... it’s no secret it’s fooking bent

 

[SebastianBlue]

The decision is made though at the point when the last player makes contact with the ball. in that frame the ball looks to be between players. There needs to be a frame as the last player makes contact with the ball.

The (very late) decision to flag was made by a producer so that they could then use VAR to find a reason to disallow the goal. In this case, by saying Anfield has a different implementation of the VAR system than every other stadium in the PL which prevented VAR from determining if the on field “decision” was correct, therefore the on field decision has to stand. Which essential is saying that in certain situations at Anfield there is no VAR review (even when the rules require it).

There was no on field decision for Salah’s goal for similar reasons.

VAR proponents: Prove me wrong (you can’t, because the league refuses to implement the simple measures that would create the transparency necessary to prove me wrong).

 

[TueartsOHK]

There seem to be a few anomalies with var, beginning with the supervisor in Stockley Park.
Some games have var and some don't.
Most grounds have big screens to show what is being debated by var, yet 2 don't. (We all know which 2 grounds those are!)
How can there be a var blind spot in any stadium and especially at a part of the pitch where an offside is very likely to occur?
VAR - a riddle, cloaked in mystery and shrouded in secrecy.

Have Wolves got screens ? unless they’ve had them installed in the last couple of seasons - my son was a season ticket holder and a lot of their fans used to complain about the lack of screens

 

[Plays By Sense Of Smell]

I have no idea if the Wolves goal was offside or not but it is a disgrace that they can't provide a camera angle to prove that it was.

However, my biggest problem is with Sarah's goal. The winger crosses the ball to him when Salah was in an offside position and because the ball skims the defender's head, Salah is classed as onside. The defender wouldn't have had to try for the ball at all if Salah wasn't in an offside position. Just seems crazy to me.

Plus, as a result of being offisde in the first, he was in a more advantageous position post-skimmed header, than he would have been if he had been onside.
So it's f*ckingwell offside.

 

[Brendan110_0]

Spot on bud soon as that ball is played then he’s offside regardless of what happens after .......... but no we have that phase bollocks no wonder the game is open to corruption ...........Salah being in that offside position affected the wolves players decision to go for the ball

It's even worse than that, they're saying he "controlled" the ball. Looked pretty uncontrolled to me.

 

[bert38]

My initial thought was he flagged when nunes crossed it the second time-when it was kicked away because the scorer did look off (therefore incorrectly off the same reason Toti header ie played the ball)…ITV assumed it was when the ball went back to nunes from the corner-I’ve not heard any clarification.

 

[HelloCity]

It should be mic’d up for transparency. It’s the thing they’re most afraid of.