EalingBlue2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 5,571
pirate said:che_don_john said:That implies though that 'society' has handed them a decent living, which isn't necessarily the case (in fact, it's rarely the case at all). What if they just knuckled down in school and got better grades? Or what if they just work that little bit harder than us?EalingBlue2 said:Course people pay more tax if they earn a lot it is fair enough those who benefit the most from society pay the most to society
I don't earn a lot because I'm not prepared to work long hours, I don't want to commute to London and I don't want too much responsibility; but some people do, so it's only fair that they get paid more. But if taxation is engineered to the point where such people's financial gain is reduced and things are levelled off, then there'll be absolutely no incentive to work harder and earn more.
The government (or whichever party aspires to be it) needs to worry less about squeezing even more money out of hard working high-earning people who already pay tax, and start focusing on getting money from those who have already avoided paying what they were supposed to pay.
thats the fallacy of the right wing in a nutshell.
the rich are rich because they are better and/or work harder and the poor are poor because they are lazy and feckless.
Its bollocks but its the basis of right wing thought
Post of the day! Many of The hardest working peoplr who contribute the most to society that I know Have been lowly paid. Most of the biggest fakers or bludgeons I have known who have done the least for society are well paid.
The central tenet of chipped argument is that because the market dictates it is fair it is fair. We should all be fighting to protect the cash of rich bankers because they deserve millions because of their hard work and slackers like casualty nurses, social workers, teachers should stop moaning and pay a bit more so the rich aren't unfairly burdened