1) Your opinions are just that. like your arguments, opinions.
2) subterfuge, deceit used in order to achieve one's goal, maybe governmental peace doesn't fit with someones profitability forecast, maybe the white west need a white enemy to stem a religious war that is simmering nicely, maybe some silly fucker droped a chunk of stolen Russian Novichock and before 100 civilians got sick they killed an ex spy with what was left....do I believe any of that? Some of it makes more sense than killing a non active defector with a murder method that is proven unreliable by it's very action.
3) ALL governments have whole departments dedicated to it. You are being insulting towards my opposing viewpoint (which is "I don't fucking know, but i dont trust my government to tell me the truth").
1) doesn’t even really make sense but yes my arguments are my opinion, do you wish my arguments to be your opinion instead?
2) nonsense, pure babble without an actual point. No evidence whatsoever and dismissive of the points I’ve actually made on other nations backing us on the issue of the poisoning.
3) ALL governments have departments designed around poisoning their citizens or ex citizens with banned chemical weapons? Have you really just said that?