Fellaini unrepentant

[Bald fraud]

Funny how nothing about this on sky sports.

Their silence is deafening considering it is now in plenty of papers that the FA are looking into it. If this was a player at another club they'd be all over it like flies on shit.

Absolutely spot on, can you imagine if this was mario or Suarez? The clip would be played in super slow motion every five minutes until they were banned

 

[Newtoncc]

He's definitely getting a ban for this.

The FA will no doubt have seen the elbow and been embarrassed by the media furore and their inability to act because the ref gave a yellow already. The spitting gives them all the opportunity they need to act.

I know we are suspicious of agenda's etc but now piss can has gone, I can't see them turning a blind eye to this. We shall see!

They don't need the spitting incident to ban him, if they wanted to they could review the incident regardless of the fact the ref gave a yellow card at the time. They don't usually because it undermines the ref but if it's a serious misjudgement they will.

Correct mate. A la Ben Thatcher v Pedro Mendes.

Interestingly, although Dermot Gallagher only gave Thatcher a yellow at the time for Thatchers disgusting assault, City took their own immediate action and banned him for 6 matches and fined him heavily. That was before the FA banned him for 8 games. Can anyone see the rags taking their own internal action?

Sure he will next few games anyway, the flak he got and the cheers when he was subbed should tell it all to Moyes, but then again..................

 

[Balti]

We got an entire week of Sky reshowing Kompany kicking a wall and Hart squaring up to a diving **** and fuck knows how many Mario incidents were shown every 20 minutes, but they don't seem remotely interested in getting Fellaini banned for his elbow and they don't even feel the need to mention the spitting. i honestly don't know how anyone can believe there is no bias

So if it was your business, would you be pissing-off 694m potential subscribers by showing it repeatedly? Only someone very stupid would do that.

Sky is a business. It knows what makes money - serving-up a Pravda-esque perspective on MUFC to plastic rag-loving fuckwits from around the country who suck it up like the brain-dead glory by remote association wankers that they are.

Not bias - business.

Knowing this, you either bin your subscription or take it for what it is.

This is absolutely correct. There is no agenda, no conspiracy, just the profit motive. Why does Sky not give wall-to-wall favourable coverage of Peterborough, Carlisle and Plymouth*? If you know the answer to that then you know why they give wall-to-wall favourable coverage of United, Liverpool and Arsenal*. One can live very easily without a Sky subscription. Very easily. And with calmness.

* I'm guessing here as I don't have and never have had Sky.

except they haven't simply served the market

through their constant promotion of their agenda, and the biased coverage resulting fromi t, they have created and exacerbated the profile of said chosen clubs to the point where it is then more damaging when one drops out of the elite

a more even handed approach to all the big clubs at the outset and not just the selected few, would have seen their business prosper despite the inevitable changes at the top

all football fans want to believe that their team can win the league......$ky doesn't want that at all and is therefore at odds with true football supporters up and down the land.......and now the FA appears to share the same view

the FA must care for tv watching rag plastics and the business interests of its primary medja partner more than it cares for real football supporters or indeed most football clubs judging by scuds comments

fuck football as a competitive sport eh? that's clearly not as important

and this is why the FA are considered a joke by many as they do not truly represent the best interests of our national sport and yet they govern it ffs

no bias my arse

BAN FELLAINUI THE DIRTY BASTARD

 

[I'm no cynic but...]

There was no assault and Fellainio didn't spit. I know this because the rags have class!

 

[Centurions]

Although there are plenty of various media outlets carrying the story (except for sky of course) most seem to be the usual copy & paste jobs.
Have the FA confirmed they are investigating this or is it purely speculation on the media's part?

 

[bert's broken neck]

Does anyone know if the gobshite's gob actually landed on Zaba?

If it did, don't expect the Gob Brush to be playing in the next few Derbies - they would be shit scared of Zaba's retribution!

 

[BluessinceHydeRoad]

Look, this vendetta aimed at a vital member of their surge towards Europe has to stop. It is, after all, based on terribly biased interpretations of the videos. It must be clear that Zaba bounced his face off the elbow while to come so close to hitting Zaba with a mouthful of spittle from that distance asks us to believe Fellaini can spit ten times more accurately than he can pass and shoot. The FA investigators are bound to realise this

 

[Plaything of the gods]

Although there are plenty of various media outlets carrying the story (except for sky of course) most seem to be the usual copy & paste jobs.
Have the FA confirmed they are investigating this or is it purely speculation on the media's part?

Marouane Fellaini: FA requests 'spit' footage of Man Utd player

The Football Association has requested further TV footage to establish whether Marouane Fellaini spat at Pablo Zabaleta during the Manchester derby.

Footage on the internet showed United's Fellaini standing over Zabaleta during the 3-0 loss at Old Trafford.

The video suggested Fellaini spat at the Manchester City defender.

The FA feels there is insufficient evidence from that posting to warrant a charge and is trying to find out if there are any clearer images.

Should such evidence be forthcoming, the FA would then need to decide whether to charge the Manchester United midfielder.

 

[Dribble]

Although there are plenty of various media outlets carrying the story (except for sky of course) most seem to be the usual copy & paste jobs.
Have the FA confirmed they are investigating this or is it purely speculation on the media's part?

Marouane Fellaini: FA requests 'spit' footage of Man Utd player

The Football Association has requested further TV footage to establish whether Marouane Fellaini spat at Pablo Zabaleta during the Manchester derby.

Footage on the internet showed United's Fellaini standing over Zabaleta during the 3-0 loss at Old Trafford.

The video suggested Fellaini spat at the Manchester City defender.

The FA feels there is insufficient evidence from that posting to warrant a charge and is trying to find out if there are any clearer images.

Should such evidence be forthcoming, the FA would then need to decide whether to charge the Manchester United midfielder.

So there's a picture of a slimy green blobule of goz on a trajectory out of Bog Brush's mouth & headed toward Zabaleta and they want more evidence? Unfuckinbelievable!

 

[Ray78]

If the FA do nothing, hopefully Vinnie will have a word when Belgium play their next international game.