FFP Timeline For Information

[Gordyola]

Here is the City / FFP timeline, with links to documents and articles to confirm dates

1. 11 February 2014 FFP Investigations Opened CAS Appeal doc 26-02-2020 * Updated
2. 16 May 2014 City Sign Settlement Agreement UEFA
   
3. 03 /08 November 2018 Der Spiegel publish stolen emails Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4
4. 03 November 2018 City Statement SKY
5. 03 january 2019 UEFA Chief Investigator Leterme, City could face a ban https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...stigator-confirms-manchester-city-could-face/
   
6. 07 March 2019 UEFA Announce Investigation into City UEFA
   
7. 07 March 2019 Club Statement re Opening of Formal Investigation CITY
   
8. 13 May 2019 NYT Tariq Panja Leaks Suggest Ban to be Recommended BBC NYT
9. 16 May 2019 UEFA Refer City to Adjudicatory Chamber Link UEFA
   
10. 16 May 2019 Club Statement re Referral to AC by IC (Leterme) CITY
11. 06 June 2019 CAS MCFC Files Appeal at CAS
    
12. 15 November 2019 CAS Decide City’s Appeal Against IC Procedure is Inadmissible CAS
13. UEFA CFCB AC Statement Decision https://www.uefa.com/insideuefa/about-uefa/news/newsid=2638659.html Banned for 20/21 & 21/22 30m Euro fine
14. 14 Feb 2020 Club Statement re Decision of AC CITY
    https://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Award_CAS_6298_internet.pdf
    
15. 26 February 2020 CAS Confirm City’s Appeal Against AC Punishment
    https://www.tas-cas.org/en/general-...s-the-appeal-of-manchester-city-v-uefa-1.html

CAS Court for Arbitration for Sport https://www.tas-cas.org/en/index.html
IC UEFA Investigative Chamber AC UEFA Adjudicatory Chamber https://www.uefa.com/insideuefa/protecting-the-game/club-financial-controlling-body/
UEFA CFCB Club Financial Control Body
https://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/uefaorg/Clublicensing/02/60/83/59/2608359_DOWNLOAD.pdf
*Update Open Skies investigation shoes Etihad sponsorship paid by ADEC
http://www.openandfairskies.com/press-releases/newly-unearthed-etihad-documents/

http://www.openandfairskies.com/wp-...08/Partnership-Rebuttal-Filing-DOT-Aug-24.pdf SEE PAGE 14

Dates 2 and 9 maybe significant as it shows the five years between the initial punishment and the referral to AC to meet the deadline, although some think that the start of the process was the start of the five years date 1

Hope this helps, I don't intend this tread to be for discussions plenty of those already. Please let me know any errors and any other significant dates that need adding

 

[Centurions]

5. Link is broken.

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

it does help, I think the thread will turn into a discussion though. But it would be good to have a factual thread because I stopped believing anything in the other threads.

 

[goldcoastblue]

Isnt the dates between 2 and 9 actually 5 years and 1 day? therfore passed the deadline to refer it. Or does it depend on the time of the document signed and the time refered?

 

[Gordyola]

5. Link is broken.

Fixed with an article just found from an earlier date

Isnt the dates between 2 and 9 actually 5 years and 1 day? therfore passed the deadline to refer it. Or does it depend on the time of the document signed and the time refered?

Google it and says 5 years 1 day including the end date

 

[BringBackSwales]

Isnt the dates between 2 and 9 actually 5 years and 1 day? therfore passed the deadline to refer it. Or does it depend on the time of the document signed and the time refered?

I assume it might be based on time of day? Presumably leaving it TIL the very last minute was part of their ongoing snide behaviour?

 

[goldcoastblue]

Fixed with an article just found from an earlier date



Google it and says 5 years 1 day including the end date

But according to uefas own disciplinary regulations article 72. It states if a punishment was 1 august then its barred on 31 jul 5 years later foe exclusions of 1 year. As we werent excluded at all in 2014, you could assume that this rule would apply to us.

Would be piss funny if this was right. Altjough i may have read the regulations wrong

 

[blueyorkie]

According to the UEFA regulations they actually have a window of 5 years from the breach rather than the date of the settlement. This being the case they timed themselves out (c/o Stefan on 93:20 podcast & blog).

 

[George Hannah]

According to the UEFA regulations they actually have a window of 5 years from the breach rather than the date of the settlement. This being the case they timed themselves out (c/o Stefan on 93:20 podcast & blog).

link please

 

[MillionMilesAway]

But according to uefas own disciplinary regulations article 72. It states if a punishment was 1 august then its barred on 31 jul 5 years later foe exclusions of 1 year. As we werent excluded at all in 2014, you could assume that this rule would apply to us.

Would be piss funny if this was right. Altjough i may have read the regulations wrong

Article 72 appears also to have an 8 year window for 2 year suspensions - this is from 2019, which is the most recent version I can find, assuming we're referencing the same thing!

I suspect it doesn't apply, as the CFCB have a separate set of regs.