carolinefrances
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Sep 2013
- Messages
- 122
No not enough! As per usual but we all know CTIDWow! Not really being following it. Are we receiving any credit for this?
No not enough! As per usual but we all know CTIDWow! Not really being following it. Are we receiving any credit for this?
Takes some doing but the beeb haven't mentioned Manchester City once this morning !Wow! Not really being following it. Are we receiving any credit for this?
absolutely agree - the ball retention of the two teams is poles apart. The USA are much better at it - they give, they go and are always on the move - unfortunately England give it away too often and too cheaply. The Americans are the City of this competition with the style of football they play and England are a couple of rungs below them.
The commentators over here were saying how great it is that Lyon have put so much money into their women's team (to buy the best players and pay the highest salaries, presumably) so that they now dominate the women's game in Europe. It's nice that the media are so consistent in how they view this type of investment in a team...Takes some doing but the beeb haven't mentioned Manchester City once this morning !
The commentators over here were saying how great it is that Lyon have put so much money into their women's team (to buy the best players and pay the highest salaries, presumably) so that they now dominate the women's game in Europe. It's nice that the media are so consistent in how they view this type of investment in a team...
Wow! Not really being following it. Are we receiving any credit for this?
England stopped Norway playing, as well as doing some good stuff themselves. I love all this so and so will punish those mistakes.
Norway were supposed to be one of those teams, too.