First man on the moon - 45 years ago

[SWP's back]

Using reason and evidence to believe the moon landings does not equate to gullibility.

Brian Cox has a very good two minute YouTube on this:

<a class="postlink" href="http://youtu.be/1aXuQ9Dg2gE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://youtu.be/1aXuQ9Dg2gE</a>

That's a shit video. It's two men babbling. Then they start talking retroreflectors and lunar lasers. The Soviets also placed retroreflectors on the Moon. So they landed men on it did they?

I knew you'd say that as that's 'your thing to say' whenever anyone mentions it.

I think it's a good video as Brian Cox is a very well educated person saying there isn't even a case to answer and that people that believe it was a hoax are morons.

 

[SWP's back]

I'm well educated and I don't believe in the moon.

Both of those statements are lies.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I'm well educated and I don't believe in the moon.

Just ours, or all of them?

 

[Wilf Wild 1937]

Using reason and evidence to believe the moon landings does not equate to gullibility.

Brian Cox has a very good two minute YouTube on this:

<a class="postlink" href="http://youtu.be/1aXuQ9Dg2gE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://youtu.be/1aXuQ9Dg2gE</a>

I've seen this before. Apart from the bad language and general ridiculing of anybody with a counter argument he tells us nothing.
The Reflector argument has been covered on this forum many, many times before. Yes there are US Reflectors on the Moon that
are used everyday. There are also Soviet Reflectors there. There is man made stuff on the moon. It does not prove man was
actually there. If somebody like Brian Cox could provide irrefutable evidence then many people, like myself, would be more
than happy to be convinced. It's really not a big deal to me.

 

[i kne albert davy]

I'm well educated and I don't believe in the moon.

Look out of the window when it's clear and dark it's definitely there. honest.

 

[west didsblue]

I'm well educated and I don't believe in the moon.

What's that big round thing in the sky that you can see at night when it's not cloudy then?

 

[Skashion]

I knew you'd say that as that's 'your thing to say' whenever anyone mentions it.

I think it's a good video as Brian Cox is a very well educated person saying there isn't even a case to answer and that people that believe it was a hoax are morons.

It's my thing to contradict bad proofs? Thank you, I'll take that as a compliment.

Being well-educated doesn't make you instantly right, and it doesn't mean you don't have to prove things. If he can't be arsed, he can't be arsed but it's not scientific to refuse to prove something.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Using reason and evidence to believe the moon landings does not equate to gullibility.

Brian Cox has a very good two minute YouTube on this:

<a class="postlink" href="http://youtu.be/1aXuQ9Dg2gE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://youtu.be/1aXuQ9Dg2gE</a>

That clip is like a bad D:Ream.

 

[BlueNirvana]

There is 100% either way. You bloody idiot.

You don't think the Russians may have raised some questions it they thought it hadn't been carried out?

I'm sick to death of idiots not being able to comprehend the magnitude of the achievement and therefore calling bullshit.

SWP's back, for someone who is obviously well educated you come across as a right dick.

You'll notice the well educated ones aren't questioning the moon landings. All 6 of them.

Also, I really don't give two hoots what you think flower.

Its petal not flower, and BTW what is a hoot ?

 

[Wilf Wild 1937]

That's a shit video. It's two men babbling. Then they start talking retroreflectors and lunar lasers. The Soviets also placed retroreflectors on the Moon. So they landed men on it did they?

Skashion, I've read your stuff on here before and I know that you know a lot about this subject.
In your opinion is there anything that could be taken as absolute proof that the moon landings happened?