When you look at the obstacles put in our way since the takeover any blue who doesn't think the games bent is deluding themselves.I would take us never winning another pot if the trophy was won fair and square every season without dodgy decisions in any game.
All i want is fair play for my money, not too much to ask is it.
To much money involved for it not to be bent added with man's greed They had a chance to introduce var and purposely fucked the trials up so they could delay bringing it in when all people wanted was a var version like they have in rugby with a bit of transparency so we could see and hear what the corrupt fuckers we're up to.
Most fans are against VAR.
I’m for VAR but it’s still at its early stages - so when VAR gets it wrong, peopls still cry corruption. We are implementing it the right way which is very slowly.
We won the league (in 2012 anyway) with help from the guy who writes that blog. I know that with 100% certainty.
Jumping back to the blog for a minute
Dec 31st 2017 - Crystal Palace 0 Manchester City 0 (Jonathan Moss gives Palace a fallacious penalty and then fails to send off Palace player Puncheon for an assault on de Bruyne. SE Asian bookmakers were aware of this outcome pre-game as were numerous members of the BT Sport crew despite the fact that Manchester City had just won 19 consecutive league games)
If the result was pre-mediated 0-0, why would (presumably in-the-know) referee give Palace a penalty? How does this prevent our scoring in the same free manner we had been doing for the previous 19 matches? Are they implying the whole City team was involved? Anyone who saw the game knows it was a shocking performance by Moss, and if the "pre-determined result" had been a palace win, then I might see some credence in the claims
Jan 4th 2018 - Tottenham Hotspur 1 West Ham United 1 (a Mike Dean spectacular with Spurs being denied half a dozen second half penalty shouts before they managed to equalise as a result of a foul on West Ham's Lanzini - this was another event with dark pool power dominating the outcome)
Again self-contradictory, the narrative suggests a pre-determined 1-1, yet spurs are denied numerous penalties before scoring a disputed goal? why not just give one of the penalties?
I'm sure there is corruption in football, spot fixing, some favouritism, and the recent cock-ups in cup draws makes that debate more relevant than ever before, not to mention the Rob Halsey comments which were quickly covered up, but widespread as this blog suggests? Far from convinced.
VAR will come, what is needed is more openness about the decision making process, miked up ref's works well in rugby, and replays of controversial decisions on the big screen would be good. But football is also about the passion for the game, which if all controversy was removed, would undoubtedly diminish. We wouldn't have this thread for one thing.
Taking the Palace game, I believe you have the wrong idea of the pre-match fix as it was on City not extending their 19 match winning streak against one of, if not the, worst teams in the country. The odds on City not getting the required win were very high.Jumping back to the blog for a minute
Dec 31st 2017 - Crystal Palace 0 Manchester City 0 (Jonathan Moss gives Palace a fallacious penalty and then fails to send off Palace player Puncheon for an assault on de Bruyne. SE Asian bookmakers were aware of this outcome pre-game as were numerous members of the BT Sport crew despite the fact that Manchester City had just won 19 consecutive league games)
If the result was pre-mediated 0-0, why would (presumably in-the-know) referee give Palace a penalty? How does this prevent our scoring in the same free manner we had been doing for the previous 19 matches? Are they implying the whole City team was involved? Anyone who saw the game knows it was a shocking performance by Moss, and if the "pre-determined result" had been a palace win, then I might see some credence in the claims
Jan 4th 2018 - Tottenham Hotspur 1 West Ham United 1 (a Mike Dean spectacular with Spurs being denied half a dozen second half penalty shouts before they managed to equalise as a result of a foul on West Ham's Lanzini - this was another event with dark pool power dominating the outcome)
Again self-contradictory, the narrative suggests a pre-determined 1-1, yet spurs are denied numerous penalties before scoring a disputed goal? why not just give one of the penalties?
I'm sure there is corruption in football, spot fixing, some favouritism, and the recent cock-ups in cup draws makes that debate more relevant than ever before, not to mention the Rob Halsey comments which were quickly covered up, but widespread as this blog suggests? Far from convinced.
VAR will come, what is needed is more openness about the decision making process, miked up ref's works well in rugby, and replays of controversial decisions on the big screen would be good. But football is also about the passion for the game, which if all controversy was removed, would undoubtedly diminish. We wouldn't have this thread for one thing.
Taking the Palace game, I believe you have the wrong idea of the pre-match fix as it was on City not extending their 19 match winning streak against one of, if not the, worst teams in the country.
City would need not to be involved in the fix except as patsies to Jonathon Moss’ corrupt refereeing (some might say he’s incompetent, he’s not) that fixed the game for his bessie mate John Coloughn, a book maker and fixer for, surprise surprise, Roy Hodgson. These three have a history of alleged fixed games going back as far as 2007.