Just to add to this, I'm not sure whether Aabar are or are not considered as a related party. Due to the fact that we paid them, to pay us, it could be argued they are a related party.
Notwithstanding that, part one of these "Leaks" showed a table, which was taken from our financial report for that season, and clearly showed a subsidy to Abu Dhabi based sponsors, which included Aabar, and whoever else from AD was sponsoring us. We did this to the tune of £150m total.
I'm not here to offer my opinion on that, it is what it is, but the fact we declared it, and the fact that UEFA at the time IIRC adjusted at least one of our sponsorship deals to represent "Fair Market Value" shows that this was dealt with, by UEFA. This action was more than likely one contributory factor to why we failed FFP that season.
The point is, there is absolutely nothing new about that at all, apart from maybe the name of one of the sponsors implicated.
There is nothing wrong with party related sponsorship at all so long as it's declared and represents fair value. We declared it, UEFA adjusted the figures, and we moved on, with a "pinch".
Parts 1-3 so far have done nothing other than re-hash old news, but with a very clear, one sided narrative. Maybe apart from the odd snippet about Aabar being named specifically, and the alleged human rights issue with Arabtec.
Nothing at all to worry about, and by Friday this will all be yesterdays news, and probably nothing at all more!
Excellent post, no dout this is an organised atempt to disrupt our continuing rise to the top of world football, almost certainly Bayern are fueling this journo as it's them who continually return to FFP and our clubs dealings. Think UEFA will have to be very careful if they reopen any investigations as a very cost legal battle could be forthcoming with City and PSG's financial might likely to be brought against them.