For or against flares/smoke bombs?

[Kenney_The_Blue]

Not health and safety this and illegal that.

Purely on creating atmosphere, are you for them?

Yes or no?



Yes

 

[Josh Blue]

Smoke bombs - yes.

Flares - no.

 

[Skashion]

For both. The atmosphere in this country is so tepid.

 

[UltraPoland]

Flares are a top top feature. Great visual effect and they smell lovely :D
About smoke...I put stroboscope kind of thing (not sure what`s the English name for it) over pure smoke-bombs (they`re quite relict now in continental ultras anyway).

 

[thecityisours]

Yes for both but health and safety wouldn't allow it.

 

[mancityvstoke]

and hand grenades for derbies ..yes

 

[thecityisours]

<a class="postlink" href="http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=piPrkoQFVqo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=piPrkoQFVqo</a>

What do you reckon about doing something like this at the swamp on monday?

 

[Cheadle_hulmeBlue]

For

think we should just have a stand full of them at the swamp

 

[BlueHalli]

I think they look awesome . They're pretty standard in the stands in world football but for some reason they feel the need to bang people up for using them in this country . Pathetic .

Unfortunately , in this country, they don't want banners, flags, drums, smokes or anything that might improve the atmos . It really needs sorting In This country. I'm convinced a full on top atmos can be worth an extra 6 points a season. I don't know why the club doesn't work really hard to improve things as it does help promote the club and makes people notice . Look at the likes of Dortmund ect .

 

[Bones]

None, football should be observed on total silence. Sat down with arms folded.