Jim Tolmie's Underpants said:selim said:Maybe those "hypocrite" people are willing to give Mancini time beacuse he is a decent manager and were not willing to give Hughes the same patience because he is shit!
Same "shit" manager that got us to the semi of the cup for the first time in 20 odd years and only 2 defeats this season until he was sacked?
Okaaaaay.....
Many people disagree that Hughes was a shit manager. But the Hughes Out brigade seem to think their opinions are somehow superior and more important.
So, in their minds, their opinion that Hughes was "shit" gave them the right to slag him off and 'undermine' him.
Just like they think their opinion that Mancini is great now gives them the right to slag off City fans who 'undermine' their new idol by commiting the crime of speculating on Mourinho coming.
Laughable, really.
Carling cup means nothing ,also number of defeats means nothing...points do.
now what about shit away performance,bad defence organization ,drawing with the likes of Burnley and hull at home,losing three derbies,spending about 200 millions to come out with a very unbalaced team and i wont mention some events of the previous season....yes,Hughes is an average manager!<br /><br />-- Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:11 pm --<br /><br />
Pita said:selim said:Actually NO! ,The whole "give managers time" debate is useless when you have a clown in charge.
Wash your mouth when you speak about Sir Mancini dude!!! The guy is a hero for us!!
Hughes spent 200 millions to build a very average team!!! Nobody knows him outside UK!
Mancini is one of the biggest name in Europe!
Inter Milan fan
I was referring to Hughes not Mancini.