Frenkie de Jong

Despite the many opinions expressed by BM posters, you are absolutely correct and the professionals are the best ones to make such decisions.

Yeah, the youngster needs ten times harder to impress Pep to be considered part of his world class team. Some like Foden is generational talent that have an easier path to accomplish his goals, but that doesn't mean he slacking off, ofc he still works hard to earn respect and get his spot in first team on daily basis. Others in academy that have lesser potential needs to understand, this is how professional football works. There's no easy way going to first team from academy.

Every team in the world does the exact same thing and City is no different on that. Don't expect hands out, keep working hard and eventually the manager will see some use on you and give a chance.
 
Is it?

We can’t put our future transfer plans on hold on the chance that a couple of youth players might get minutes.

We didn’t stop signing players to bring Foden through did we? He made it because he was good enough.

Always reminds me when we were linked with Messi a couple of years ago and this guy said ‘does this mean less minutes for Braaf?’. Just bizarre thinking.

Chelsea spent 10 years saying "if kids are good enough, they'll make it through" leading to precisely 0 making it, and look at what happened when they finally were forced to abandon that plan and give the kids a chance because of the transfer ban.

Mount, Hudson-Odoi, Christensen, Chalobah, Reece James all fixtures in the CL winning first team and worth probably £350m all in. RLC coming in now, and even Tammy Abraham got them £35m because he started half a season.

We have kids who are every bit as good as Chlesea's, but they need a chance. It doesn't just happen on its own.

The squad has to be planned for it. That doesn't mean not signing FDJ if he's really going to improve the side, but it might mean selling like Gundo earlier than expected.
 
We need to replace Fern, Rodri is playing far too much in term of fatigue later in the season, FDJ would be a wonderful signing for us.

I don’t see how it would work having basically two first choice dm players. Surely he’d want to be starting every week
 
I don’t see how it would work having basically two first choice dm players. Surely he’d want to be starting every week

FDJ's best position is #8. Koeman moved him there last year and he completely controlled games, split the defence with passes no one else could play and also got a bunch of goals making late runs into the box.

If we were to buy him I don't see how he'd fit unless he would be replacing Gundo. He's an 8 who can play 6 if you set the team up specifically for it, or CB in a pinch.

It would be a good move if you wanted to bring kids through. People were talking about a kid being 4th CB, well you could do that if we had another senior player who could slot in if needed, so you've got 3.5 seniors plus a kid. Same with Lavia at 6. Going from Rodri+Fern to Rodri+Lavia is a bit risky, but if you had FDJ as well, he'd be your extra cover.
 
Last edited:
Chelsea spent 10 years saying "if kids are good enough, they'll make it through" leading to precisely 0 making it, and look at what happened when they finally were forced to abandon that plan and give the kids a chance because of the transfer ban.

Mount, Hudson-Odoi, Christensen, Chalobah, Reece James all fixtures in the CL winning first team and worth probably £350m all in. RLC coming in now, and even Tammy Abraham got them £35m because he started half a season.

We have kids who are every bit as good as Chlesea's, but they need a chance. It doesn't just happen on its own.

The squad has to be planned for it. That doesn't mean not signing FDJ if he's really going to improve the side, but it might mean selling like Gundo earlier than expected.

Don't treat player development like somekind milestone that need to be accomplished, if the professionals that handles them think they aren't ready yet then they aren't. Good for Chelsea for doing that, but in City they seems handles their youth differently. We prefer to keep the player with highest potential to make it into first squad and develop them in house with world class coaching to integrating them slowly into first team, while those that do not will be given a second chance in loan to prove themselves.

Training and being mentored by world class coach and player in first team is more invaluable than playing for minutes in inferior team with their lower standard coach and playstyles.

In short Chelsea and City handles their youth differently, no one is more right than the others. Both are valid option to handles the youth.
 

Foden/Jesus - NEW#9/Torres - Sterling/Mahrez
Gundo/Grealish - KDB/Bernardo
Rodri/FDJ

Plenty of room for the lad, 50-60 game a season, 3 of those 30 or over next year before sales. Overkill? maybe, worth the pissboiling? Totally.



 
In short Chelsea and City handles their youth differently, no one is more right than the others. Both are valid option to handles the youth.

This argument looks pretty silly when we've produced 1 first team regular in 10 years and Chelsea are lining up with 6 at a time while playing at the same level.

One is clearly more right if it's working better.
 
This argument looks pretty stupid when we've produced 1 first team regular in 10 years and Chelsea are lining up with 6 at a time while playing at the same level.

One is clearly more right if it's working better.

The argument will be more stupid if any of those chelsea youngster is even good enough for our squad, i can count two that make a cut. one probably starting the other is bench player and not more than that. While City youngster is in similar situation so it's even.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.