We beat Sunderland i think on pens and remember Paul Power running the length of the Kippax celebrating..Gary James said:The Full Members Cup was structured differently to most competitions and was played on a regional basis up until the final as they wanted to ensure the final was North V South.
Initially we were in a 3 team group with Leeds and Sheff Utd. Then we played Sunderland in the Northern semi-final (we won 4-3 on penalties). Then Hull in the Northern Final.
We had a pitch invasion to celebrate progressing (I'd have to check but I think the pitch invasion was after the Sunderland game, not Hull - anyone else remember?).
The final V Chelsea was played the day after the OT derby because Oxford (who I think Chelsea played in the Southern final) refused to move their game with Chelsea on the proposed date. So instead of playing 1 game that weekend we both had to play 2.
City and Chelsea had to guarantee the costs of Wembley because the perception was that the game would be watched by a pitiful crowd. In the end 68,000 were there.
When Chelsea won the cup they celebrated and boasted of the success for some time. To them the competition was highly significant. Nowadays they rarely mention it, but back then they treated it as a significant achievement. Sir Richard Attenborough was guest of honour (also a Chelsea fan) and even the programme was produced by the Chelsea programme team (City & Chelsea basically had to take over the running of the final).
The 2nd Leg was at Maine Rd against Hull and there was not a pitch invasion, so it must have been the Sunderland game. It's funny you should talk about the programme for the final, I recall the guide to City called us "the Chelsea of the north" something I had never heard before and not since(until the take over).Gary James said:The Full Members Cup was structured differently to most competitions and was played on a regional basis up until the final as they wanted to ensure the final was North V South.
Initially we were in a 3 team group with Leeds and Sheff Utd. Then we played Sunderland in the Northern semi-final (we won 4-3 on penalties). Then Hull in the Northern Final.
We had a pitch invasion to celebrate progressing (I'd have to check but I think the pitch invasion was after the Sunderland game, not Hull - anyone else remember?).
The final V Chelsea was played the day after the OT derby because Oxford (who I think Chelsea played in the Southern final) refused to move their game with Chelsea on the proposed date. So instead of playing 1 game that weekend we both had to play 2.
City and Chelsea had to guarantee the costs of Wembley because the perception was that the game would be watched by a pitiful crowd. In the end 68,000 were there.
When Chelsea won the cup they celebrated and boasted of the success for some time. To them the competition was highly significant. Nowadays they rarely mention it, but back then they treated it as a significant achievement. Sir Richard Attenborough was guest of honour (also a Chelsea fan) and even the programme was produced by the Chelsea programme team (City & Chelsea basically had to take over the running of the final).
DontLookBackInAnger said:The 2nd Leg was at Maine Rd against Hull and there was not a pitch invasion, so it must have been the Sunderland game. It's funny you should talk about the programme for the final, I recall the guide to City called us "the Chelsea of the north" something I had never heard before and not since(until the take over).
m27 said:The derby the day before was my first at OT and I'll never forget Kenny Clements getting injured and coming off in tears knowing that probably his last chance to play at Wembley had gone.
What a game that derby was though, "oooooohh, Arthur Arthur! Arthur Arthur Arthur Albiston ......"
Gary James said:m27 said:The derby the day before was my first at OT and I'll never forget Kenny Clements getting injured and coming off in tears knowing that probably his last chance to play at Wembley had gone.
What a game that derby was though, "oooooohh, Arthur Arthur! Arthur Arthur Arthur Albiston ......"
I wonder if Albistion knew his name was being chanted at Wembley the next day?
The 2-2 V Utd was a bit of a pride game. We were supposed to roll over and let utd humiliate us, plus we had that final to play (no matter how you look at it now, it was significant to play in a Wembley final back then because it was so rare for any team to play there). Billy McNeill deliberately picked what he called a 'Manchester' team to play Utd and it worked.
City's team was predominantly Mancunian/players who had developed via the Club. Utd's only 'Manc' that day was ex-Blue Peter Barnes.
The 2-2 draw was worth celebrating, and we couldn't wait for Wembley.
masterwig said:How seriously did teams take this competition? Was it ever considered on a par with the League Cup or was it a bit of a joke cup?