sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Pretty sure we’d lose Jesus if he’s not pencilled in as first choice post-Kun.
Too good to accept second place for ever.
Too good to accept second place for ever.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Future Strikers
- Thread starter Sir Joe Aguero
- Start date
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
The rags will throw stupid money at Kane and fits their buying British theme they’ve got going at the minuteNot for the money Spurs would want, even if he kicked up a fuss. Would be curious to see how many he'd score in our team though.
Mancini Manus Domini
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 1,682
Honest opinion now
How many on here would be happy to just swap Jesus for kun when he is ready to retire .what I mean is that we just buy a second choice striker and not someone like Kane etc ?
Yes, I would.
Honest opinion now
How many on here would be happy to just swap Jesus for kun when he is ready to retire .what I mean is that we just buy a second choice striker and not someone like Kane etc ?
I would.
I think the team is better balanced with Jesus in it anyway, now.
Aguero is obviously more lethal and has been the best since he came to England but he’s now slowed and I think Jesus adds a different dynamic.
B
B
BLUEMATT23
Guest
Zaha?
richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 28,194
Could we not sign another winger and move raz central if required?
Sir Joe Aguero
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 3,197
Works for me. Could get Werner for 30mil buyout, use Foden and Bernardo in Silva’s slot and get Sancho for right wing.The rags will throw stupid money at Kane and fits their buying British theme they’ve got going at the minute
Sterling/Sane, Werner & Sancho as a front 3 would be deadly. If Sane goes, Werner could play LW/LF without upsetting Jesus’ game time, or could play with 2 strikers. If Sane went, I don’t think the net spend would be huge.
This is my thought too. He's an awesome striker, and with free run as a CF i think he'd be deadly.Could we not sign another winger and move raz central if required?
Sane is out at the mo, but with Raheem, Mahrez, Sane and Jesus we have all we need, provided that they stay.
I really don't think Kane is city material - he is too preoccupied with him-self and not, imho, a team player in the City sense. And i really doubt he'd get first team games in our current team.... Minus Aguero i don't know - he certainly hasn't got the team play mentality of Jesus, and unless the team dynamic changes drastically i don't see a place for him at City under Pep.
Son, however.... I think he'd fit very well into our team. Under Pep he'd be phenomenal. But, as a replacement for Aguero we have to understand that Pep may not be at City when Sergio goes, so whoever comes in wont have his influence. But still i think Son would make a fantastic edition should we be in need of a striker.
If Poch goes in the next twelve months, then Son may be up for leaving too. But could he step up into a team with Sergio, Jesus, Sterling, Sane and Mahraz in it?
Kane has got utd written all over him. I doubt very much he'd come to, or even fit in at City. The board probably won't even entertain his fee, to begin with.
It was interesting to see the reports this weekend that we value Jesus at 100m to put off interest from Bayern. Is the value come from us? and if so are we prepared to sell him?Pretty sure we’d lose Jesus if he’s not pencilled in as first choice post-Kun.
Too good to accept second place for ever.