Future Wingers

Which is how it should be, first Braaf has to get on the subs bench, today we saw Foden playing on the wing? and all season Sane has been out who came in to play LW? Sterling, and who played when he was injured? Braaf needs to be on the bench but for that we need a fully fit squad
If we have a fully fit squad then Braaf has an even lower chance of making the bench.

If we are waiting for people to constantly get injured before giving our talent a chance then it's quite a flawed approach.

If you want to argue for playing Sterling into form, that's fine, but don't connect that idea to players being injured for youth to play.
 
If we have a fully fit squad then Braaf has an even lower chance of making the bench.

If we are waiting for people to constantly get injured before giving our talent a chance then it's quite a flawed approach.

If you want to argue for playing Sterling into form, that's fine, but don't connect that idea to players being injured for youth to play.

If we had a fully fit squad the form and the mistakes would reduce everyone would challenge the person in front of them and we would have a pretty set style, but we have only 1 left winger and he is injured, but that is probably not the reason Braaf has not even been on the bench, that probably has more to do with who would be behind him at LWB, so your probably right Sterling playing well or badly has nothing to do with Braaf, but injuries do when they happen in such large groups, most managers would pick players that are fit and others that can cover and that takes up your full match squad
 
Milot Rashica? Can apparently leave to any top 5 league except Bundeliga for 38m euro. I think he would make a ton of sense for us. Winger/center forward with similarities to Hazard and Sterling, and with great end product.

He's got a cheap release clause, is still very young, and is weirdly underhyped which means he represents good value. These are typically players we go for. I think he'd want to come to us at any cost, even if the CL ban is upheld

 
Milot Rashica? Can apparently leave to any top 5 league except Bundeliga for 38m euro. I think he would make a ton of sense for us. Winger/center forward with similarities to Hazard and Sterling, and with great end product.

He's got a cheap release clause, is still very young, and is weirdly underhyped which means he represents good value. These are typically players we go for. I think he'd want to come to us at any cost, even if the CL ban is upheld


Why would we possibly want another right footed player on the left? It's absolutely destroyed the speed of our attack this season, and that's with Sterling, who is one of the best wingers in world football.
 
Milot Rashica? Can apparently leave to any top 5 league except Bundeliga for 38m euro. I think he would make a ton of sense for us. Winger/center forward with similarities to Hazard and Sterling, and with great end product.

He's got a cheap release clause, is still very young, and is weirdly underhyped which means he represents good value. These are typically players we go for. I think he'd want to come to us at any cost, even if the CL ban is upheld



Could not agree more. Would be a typical City singing. Under the radar and good price. He makes too much sense for us to sign, so we will miss out. LW who has pace (not Sane level) and end product. Ideal for when Sane leaves.
 
Why would we possibly want another right footed player on the left? It's absolutely destroyed the speed of our attack this season, and that's with Sterling, who is one of the best wingers in world football.
We could throw Sterling to the right with Rashica on the left. I think that would work as Sterling would be the one offering width. The reason we're struggling now is that we have two inverted wingers, which means that we become very predictable. One inverted and one on the strong foot should work in theory
 
We could throw Sterling to the right with Rashica on the left. I think that would work as Sterling would be the one offering width. The reason we're struggling now is that we have two inverted wingers, which means that we become very predictable. One inverted and one on the strong foot should work in theory
Why not play both wingers on their strong foot? Why compromise?

We're at our very best when we make the pitch as big as possible in attack, making decisive runs in behind, crossing to the back post for a tap in. Not only does the additional width create chances itself, it also creates space in the middle for the likes of De Bruyne, Bernardo, Silva and Foden, especially after 60/70 minutes when teams get tired.

Inverted wingers just makes the game easy for the opposite fullback, allowing him to play safe; staying narrow and slowing the winger down so one of the midfielders can comeback and double up. It's useful on occasion or as a different option but that's it.

We should force Mahrez to play on the left, he's got all the qualities needed, it's just he wants the personal glory of cutting in and scoring a worldwide, he's not interested in the team.
 
Why not play both wingers on their strong foot? Why compromise?

We're at our very best when we make the pitch as big as possible in attack, making decisive runs in behind, crossing to the back post for a tap in. Not only does the additional width create chances itself, it also creates space in the middle for the likes of De Bruyne, Bernardo, Silva and Foden, especially after 60/70 minutes when teams get tired.

Inverted wingers just makes the game easy for the opposite fullback, allowing him to play safe; staying narrow and slowing the winger down so one of the midfielders can comeback and double up. It's useful on occasion or as a different option but that's it.

We should force Mahrez to play on the left, he's got all the qualities needed, it's just he wants the personal glory of cutting in and scoring a worldwide, he's not interested in the team.
Who should we buy if Sané leaves? Leon Bailey will never cut it at City, he's wildly inconsistent. Not really that much options for a left footed left winger. I personally think Mahrez is too slow for that role, and his main quality is cutting in and shooting. Mahrez could play left wing, but he would a a bit wasted there
 
Who should we buy if Sané leaves? Leon Bailey will never cut it at City, he's wildly inconsistent. Not really that much options for a left footed left winger. I personally think Mahrez is too slow for that role, and his main quality is cutting in and shooting. Mahrez could play left wing, but he would a a bit wasted there
That's a ridiculous statement, of course there are options. We're not going to get someone as talented attacking wise as Sane, it's virtually impossible, he has a skillset which is very unique. Equally he's got weaknesses defensively, in terms of his desire to win the ball back on occasion and awareness. You also have to remember we didn't buy Sane as a left winger, he played the majority of his football at Shalke as a right winger, we moved him across to the left.

Likewise, someone like Bailey who is "wildly inconsistent" to use your words, may well work out perfectly in a different environment with a new manager and players who can get the best out of him. You just never know, look at Angelino at RB Leipzig, he looks like a bloody world beater again; simply because the system gets the best out of his attacking talent, while a back three compensates for his weaknesses defensively.

It's pointless me listing a stream of names because I'm not a full time scout so don't know the players backgrounds, attitudes, levels of consistency or personal life's which all contribute to them being successful.
 
That's a ridiculous statement, of course there are options. We're not going to get someone as talented attacking wise as Sane, it's virtually impossible, he has a skillset which is very unique. Equally he's got weaknesses defensively, in terms of his desire to win the ball back on occasion and awareness. You also have to remember we didn't buy Sane as a left winger, he played the majority of his football at Shalke as a right winger, we moved him across to the left.

Likewise, someone like Bailey who is "wildly inconsistent" to use your words, may well work out perfectly in a different environment with a new manager and players who can get the best out of him. You just never know, look at Angelino at RB Leipzig, he looks like a bloody world beater again; simply because the system gets the best out of his attacking talent, while a back three compensates for his weaknesses defensively.

It's pointless me listing a stream of names because I'm not a full time scout so don't know the players backgrounds, attitudes, levels of consistency or personal life's which all contribute to them being successful.
I tend to agree with the majority of what you said, but just left footed left wingers are almost extinct, every left footer is an inverted winger now. And to convert them properly they need raw pace and great low crossing. Mahrez is a great playmaker but he's not really known to burn defenders with pace, he relies on body feints and agility

Bailey's teammate Moussa Diaby is someone who we maybe could go for. He's a similar playee to Bailey and is keeping Bailey on the bench while being younger. His speed is almost Sané levels
 
I tend to agree with the majority of what you said, but just left footed left wingers are almost extinct, every left footer is an inverted winger now. And to convert them properly they need raw pace and great low crossing. Mahrez is a great playmaker but he's not really known to burn defenders with pace, he relies on body feints and agility

Bailey's teammate Moussa Diaby is someone who we maybe could go for. He's a similar playee to Bailey and is keeping Bailey on the bench while being younger. His speed is almost Sané levels
Sane was an inverted winger when we signed him. So why limit ourselves now to only looking for someone who currently plays on the left? It doesn't make sense. If someone has the right skillset and attributes to play for us as a left winger, it doesn't matter if they're currently playing on the right wing, central midfield or as a central striker.

Mahrez could easily play on the left, he's more than quick enough and he wouldn't suddenly lose the body feints and agility if we changed his position. He's got the shooting ability to go across the keeper from the left and his crossing ability is very good, playing on the left would just give him more opportunities to get crosses in. I highly doubt Mahrez would want to do it though, he seems very selfish in general and wants the individual glory for the odd wonder goal he does score from cutting in from the right.
 
Sane was an inverted winger when we signed him. So why limit ourselves now to only looking for someone who currently plays on the left? It doesn't make sense. If someone has the right skillset and attributes to play for us as a left winger, it doesn't matter if they're currently playing on the right wing, central midfield or as a central striker.

Mahrez could easily play on the left, he's more than quick enough and he wouldn't suddenly lose the body feints and agility if we changed his position. He's got the shooting ability to go across the keeper from the left and his crossing ability is very good, playing on the left would just give him more opportunities to get crosses in. I highly doubt Mahrez would want to do it though, he seems very selfish in general and wants the individual glory for the odd wonder goal he does score from cutting in from the right.
I think ESTS point is that there are few explosive left footed wingers out there. Regardless of what position they play.

Don't know how true that is as I haven't been following football this year as in years past.
 
I think ESTS point is that there are few explosive left footed wingers out there. Regardless of what position they play.

Don't know how true that is as I haven't been following football this year as in years past.
In regard to wingers he's correct, hence why I said we should broaden our horizons and look for specific skillsets. For example Miggy Almiron at Newcastle; currently playing attacking midfield/second striker but he's got everything, he needs to add consistency to his game absolutely but he could definitely work with a bit of Pep's tactical magic and restricting him to the "simple things".
 
Why would we possibly want another right footed player on the left? It's absolutely destroyed the speed of our attack this season, and that's with Sterling, who is one of the best wingers in world football.
Because he is a much better dribbler than Sterling and has a better shot. Sterling is a pure RW/SS looking at his skillset. Rashica is someone who can get past someone without just running. But yeah where u gonna find another Sané. Another reason to pay him.
 
Might as well try to include Gnabry in the Sané deal. Highly doubt Bayern would agree too it though, but Gnabry would be perfect. He's got exceptional end product for a winger, is still young, and equally as good on LW as RW

Edit: I really rate Ferran Torres too. Seems like the type of signing we go after. Underhyped with world class potential. He's a bit like Sancho but much more toned down with the skill moves and flair. Both do not have blistering pace, but are still quick. Instead they have incredible vision and understanding of the game. Torres seems to be almost completely two footed too
 
Last edited:
If Sane goes take Davis in the deal and buy Dembele from Barca, very quick, tall uses both feet very well, a problem child that could be a worldie, and they need the cash, him Braaf,Mahrez and Streling are all very different wingers
 
Because he is a much better dribbler than Sterling and has a better shot. Sterling is a pure RW/SS looking at his skillset. Rashica is someone who can get past someone without just running. But yeah where u gonna find another Sané. Another reason to pay him.
I agree with Sterling being a pure RW or SS, absolutely. We just need a left footed version now; if or seemingly when Sane leaves.
 
If Sane goes take Davis in the deal and buy Dembele from Barca, very quick, tall uses both feet very well, a problem child that could be a worldie, and they need the cash, him Braaf,Mahrez and Streling are all very different wingers

Bayern will not be selling their up and coming stars (Davis and Gnabry) and they are not looking to leave. Dembele is unfortunately extremely injury prone and has some personal issues that seem to prevent him from performing. We may never know the background but he reminds me of Mario too much.
 
If Sane goes take Davis in the deal and buy Dembele from Barca, very quick, tall uses both feet very well, a problem child that could be a worldie, and they need the cash, him Braaf,Mahrez and Streling are all very different wingers
Dembele would be amazing if he were actually able to play consistently. I think Dembele and Mendy would be a recipe for disaster. 150m on social media cheerleaders. Mendy has been good recently though
 
Dembele would be amazing if he were actually able to play consistently. I think Dembele and Mendy would be a recipe for disaster. 150m on social media cheerleaders. Mendy has been good recently though
Quite frankly i do not see Mendy as having a future with us, although he will be with us next season, Dembele does come with baggage and that will be reflected in his price £ 75 million at most for us, he would also be part of a 4 man winger position so injuries would not be as devastating as Sane`s this season
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top