Gary Neville

I just think he’s a good pundit. A breath of fresh air since he’s been on Sky. I knew I’d upset the ‘villagers’. ‘We don’t won’t strange folk like yu round these parts’. ‘ keep ur fancy ‘forts to ya self, if ya know wats gud fu you”
That’s a little bit hostile considering you’ve only been here 2 minutes. Are you deliberately looking for a confrontation?
I can see your online character requires it for you to stand out and look edgy but talking in text talk is against the CoC because it looks stupid and winds people up - which is also against the CoC.
 
He shouldn’t commentate on United games. The same can be said for Carragher when Liverpool play.
 
Neville‘s decent, by far one of the best pundits and commentators. Though I agree the pool is shallow
 
It pains me more than it pains neville to pundit our games,mind you he is on telly and he cant hide his collapse as well as uniteds. So just get the popcorn.


I d rather see dunny, bellars, buzzer, micah or any other former blue on telly for our games every time, that **** neville is stealing other folks wages. I dont care for him or do I need him in my life or on the TV screne for that matter(he is a rather ugly looking bastid).
Rat springs to mind.
 
Look let’s remember he’s a utd fan but at least unlike the scouser he does give credit to us at times and of course sticks the boot in as well,but expecting him to be totally impartial when his team is playing is pushing it,if any of us were pundits would we be impartial I think we know the answer to that,he doesn’t really bother me,him and souness are by far head and shoulders above the rest,and though he’s a horrible bastard Keane also seems a good pundit and says it as it is regardless who he played for...
Be fair even a blind man would gives us credit for the way we play ;-)
 
This is the least Machiavellian thing you have ever posted (:
tumblr_mn9oa3CXZ51r6dk8qo1_500.gif
 
I have not read all the posts on GN pundit. But I like him as a person and as a pundit. He’s very good, I think the best around at the moment. He really think he thinks about what he says and makes very good non cliche observations. I think he is fare to us to be honest. Yes he’s a united fan but so what. When he’s not on say MNF it’s just not as good. Because United are a bit off the boil at the moment makes him more interesting to me anyway. I imagine this post will upset the hardliners and I will be ran out of town and my homestead burnt down. But I just think he’s an excellent pundit.
Where is the dislike button when you need it?
 
Tbh, I can't stand the ****, but I think he is genuinely a terrible commentator, bias aside. He's far too interested in being the center of attention, he never shuts up. A good commentary team shouldn't be noticed very much, at most they should be just keeping you company while you watch the game. But him and Tyler are constantly talking, constantly offering opinions, constantly trying to make soundbites that will "bang" on twitter, instead of just guiding you through the game. They make it impossible to ignore them, they are the dickheads that constantly talk during movies.

They aren't alone in that, there are a ton of these shit commentators who just can't let a few minutes pass without saying something unnecessarily over the top or irksome, but it does my head in. (hoddle/savage/owen/mcpointy all strong contenders for most annoying).

He's marginally better as a pundit, as he clearly has time to prepare a bit (or have others prepare what he's going to say) but when he's left to just ramble on he's awful. His post game coverage is always much worse than his pregame as well, full of over the top nonsense, cliches and stating the obvious, which leads me to believe that he's just not very insightful when put on the spot.

I really enjoy Don Goodman on the CHampionship coverage (and used to enjoy Hinchcliffe when he did that, before he sold his soul to get the PL games). He's just in the background, having an informal chat with the main commentator most of the time. He doesn't go over the top, he doesn't scream like a girl, he's pretty much ignorable if you want, but is perfectly pleasant.
 
Tbh, I can't stand the ****, but I think he is genuinely a terrible commentator, bias aside. He's far too interested in being the center of attention, he never shuts up. A good commentary team shouldn't be noticed very much, at most they should be just keeping you company while you watch the game. But him and Tyler are constantly talking, constantly offering opinions, constantly trying to make soundbites that will "bang" on twitter, instead of just guiding you through the game. They make it impossible to ignore them, they are the dickheads that constantly talk during movies.

They aren't alone in that, there are a ton of these shit commentators who just can't let a few minutes pass without saying something unnecessarily over the top or irksome, but it does my head in. (hoddle/savage/owen/mcpointy all strong contenders for most annoying).

He's marginally better as a pundit, as he clearly has time to prepare a bit (or have others prepare what he's going to say) but when he's left to just ramble on he's awful. His post game coverage is always much worse than his pregame as well, full of over the top nonsense, cliches and stating the obvious, which leads me to believe that he's just not very insightful when put on the spot.

I really enjoy Don Goodman on the CHampionship coverage (and used to enjoy Hinchcliffe when he did that, before he sold his soul to get the PL games). He's just in the background, having an informal chat with the main commentator most of the time. He doesn't go over the top, he doesn't scream like a girl, he's pretty much ignorable if you want, but is perfectly pleasant.
Good post. The Richie Benaud less is more approach to commentating is sadly obsolete now, the airwaves are awash with self serving cvnts desperate to unload their pre prepared cliche ridden bon mots on us

It’s irked me for years that in this high tech digital age we can’t simply opt for no comms with the press of a button. I suspect it’s because the broadcasters view the comms as salesmen always reinforcing how exciting the (often dull) game we’re watching is and reminding us of unmissable games to come.
 
Tbh, I can't stand the ****, but I think he is genuinely a terrible commentator, bias aside. He's far too interested in being the center of attention, he never shuts up. A good commentary team shouldn't be noticed very much, at most they should be just keeping you company while you watch the game. But him and Tyler are constantly talking, constantly offering opinions, constantly trying to make soundbites that will "bang" on twitter, instead of just guiding you through the game. They make it impossible to ignore them, they are the dickheads that constantly talk during movies.

They aren't alone in that, there are a ton of these shit commentators who just can't let a few minutes pass without saying something unnecessarily over the top or irksome, but it does my head in. (hoddle/savage/owen/mcpointy all strong contenders for most annoying).

He's marginally better as a pundit, as he clearly has time to prepare a bit (or have others prepare what he's going to say) but when he's left to just ramble on he's awful. His post game coverage is always much worse than his pregame as well, full of over the top nonsense, cliches and stating the obvious, which leads me to believe that he's just not very insightful when put on the spot.

I really enjoy Don Goodman on the CHampionship coverage (and used to enjoy Hinchcliffe when he did that, before he sold his soul to get the PL games). He's just in the background, having an informal chat with the main commentator most of the time. He doesn't go over the top, he doesn't scream like a girl, he's pretty much ignorable if you want, but is perfectly pleasant.

I totally agree with that. If it's a United game he never shuts up; 'why is he jogging back?' 'such and such is making a run' 'he's free in the middle' 'stay on side', combined with load sighing and groaning if someone (a United player, not the opposition) over hits a pass or a cross.
 
Dunno what I want to hear today the sulky schoolboy Neville as he watches the scum get beaten badly, or the cock a hoop they are back jubilant crowing Neville aided and abetted by Red Tyler ! Whatever one turns up there is still Caragher to have to endure !
 
Good post. The Richie Benaud less is more approach to commentating is sadly obsolete now, the airwaves are awash with self serving cvnts desperate to unload their pre prepared cliche ridden bon mots on us

It’s irked me for years that in this high tech digital age we can’t simply opt for no comms with the press of a button. I suspect it’s because the broadcasters view the comms as salesmen always reinforcing how exciting the (often dull) game we’re watching is and reminding us of unmissable games to come.
There was a great moment in the baseball game last night. Guy hits a walkoff homerun to send his team to the world series, which is just about the most exciting thing that can happen in an entire season of baseball. The commentator Joe Buck announces it as it's happening, but then is just silent for about a minute as the celebrations go on. It's great, it lets the moment speak for itself. Something football commentators seem incapable of doing, they seem to think you need to try and get your line out, say something memorable, when it should be about the actual moment.
 
Tbh, I can't stand the ****, but I think he is genuinely a terrible commentator, bias aside. He's far too interested in being the center of attention, he never shuts up. A good commentary team shouldn't be noticed very much, at most they should be just keeping you company while you watch the game. But him and Tyler are constantly talking, constantly offering opinions, constantly trying to make soundbites that will "bang" on twitter, instead of just guiding you through the game. They make it impossible to ignore them, they are the dickheads that constantly talk during movies.

They aren't alone in that, there are a ton of these shit commentators who just can't let a few minutes pass without saying something unnecessarily over the top or irksome, but it does my head in. (hoddle/savage/owen/mcpointy all strong contenders for most annoying).

He's marginally better as a pundit, as he clearly has time to prepare a bit (or have others prepare what he's going to say) but when he's left to just ramble on he's awful. His post game coverage is always much worse than his pregame as well, full of over the top nonsense, cliches and stating the obvious, which leads me to believe that he's just not very insightful when put on the spot.

I really enjoy Don Goodman on the CHampionship coverage (and used to enjoy Hinchcliffe when he did that, before he sold his soul to get the PL games). He's just in the background, having an informal chat with the main commentator most of the time. He doesn't go over the top, he doesn't scream like a girl, he's pretty much ignorable if you want, but is perfectly pleasant.
AHIAC
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top