A few years ago, I think he was happy for City to win at the expense of Liverpool. I think that's now changed. He's far more pro-Liverpool than pro-City. I think he sees what's going on at City and realises that we could dismantle all of United's records in his lifetime.
Well that is speculation. I can only comment on what he says and not why I think he says it. His attack on our owners and serenading of Liverpool's owners the other week was a perfect example. If he said that because he fears Carragher then I'm yet to see the evidence.I don't think that's the case at all. He just sits next to spitty who would give him absolute shite if he dared pipe up against the dippers now. We're an easy target because no one's there to stick up with us. And as much as he thinks his opinion is
Well that is speculation. I can only comment on what he says and not why I think he says it. His attack on our owners and serenading of Liverpool's owners the other week was a perfect example. If he said that because he fears Carragher then I'm yet to see the evidence.
Banter is fine but this **** and Carragher it’s pure hatred do you believe they have impartial views on City games ????? They both sit there dying for you to lose ......... you saw Carraghers reaction after your win yesterday he was fooking wounded so why have commentators or pundits like that who have no connection to either Newcastle or City ???There’s some fucking sensitive souls on here. The day piss taking and football are separated is the day I’m done with it…
Would you agree that it was unprofessional? He was there as a representative of Sky. He is meant to offer an unbiased opinion to viewers.There’s some fucking sensitive souls on here. The day piss taking and football are separated is the day I’m done with it…
Would you agree that it was unprofessional? He was there as a representative of Sky. He is meant to offer an unbiased opinion to viewers.
Those comments weren't done in the Dog and Duck with City mates, if he had i'd agree it's banter. Doing it as he walks through a Premier League ground like he did makes him look like a giggling 14 year old who has just seen a copy of Razzle for the first time.
Let’s see if he has the balls to walk into Mary Dee’s on a match day and repeat what he said when nobody was about.Can we change the title to lynch Neville? He is an odious scripted scrote.
Let’s see if he has the balls to walk into Mary Dee’s on a match day and repeat what he said when nobody was about.
The bloke is an absolute coward.
Sorry mate - don't agree with that.Neville used to be okay as a pundit/co-commentator until after his failed attempt at management. Since then he's just a bitter hypocrite who fancies himself as some sort of footballing saviour, positioning himself as a potential candidate for the "independent" regulator. Probably in a joint capacity with his new best mate Spit the dog.
Anyone on here that's paying for Sky Sports just remember you are putting money into the 6 fingered cunts pocket along with Spitty and Tyler...Three of them should be starved of oxygen. Absolute wasters.
Jimmy Greaves was an excellent broadcaster. He was funny but always kind which is a rare talent.It's symptomatic of a general decline in broadcasting standards and indicative of a juvenile undercurrent that has permeated the fabric of a once-great broadcaster. The whole image of Sky Sports' PL coverage is now predicated on the banter and egotism of Jamie Carragher and Gary Neville.
In previous times, their behaviour both collectively and individually would not have been tolerated. Spitting at a teenage girl? Inciting vandalism and violence at a football ground? In the days of Ian St. John, Jimmy Greaves, Brian Moore and David Coleman, no such behaviour would have taken place because it would have been abundantly clear that any such behaviour would have led to dismissal.
Speaking of St. John and Greaves, they were able to have "bantz" and be light-hearted without insulting other teams and the fans who pay their wages. Sky know full well that this lamentable double act plays to the base of the fans of two clubs and two clubs only. That's why Carragher in particular wasn't sacked when he fucking well should have been. For all of their sickening lectures in morality, they revealed their hand when they didn't sack Carragher. When push comes to shove, money comes before their faux morality.
When all is said and done, Gary Neville is a fucking gobshite twat and Jamie Carragher a feral scumbag. The cult of personality and unconditional faith in their own hubris will be their undoing.
Anyone on here that's paying for Sky Sports just remember you are putting money into the 6 fingered cunts pocket along with Spitty and Tyler...Three of them should be starved of oxygen. Absolute wasters.
Anyone on here that's paying for Sky Sports just remember you are putting money into the 6 fingered cunts pocket along with Spitty and Tyler...Three of them should be starved of oxygen. Absolute wasters.
Hopefully that will also happen in the lifetime of his former manager.A few years ago, I think he was happy for City to win at the expense of Liverpool. I think that's now changed. He's far more pro-Liverpool than pro-City. I think he sees what's going on at City and realises that we could dismantle all of United's records in his lifetime.
Hopefully when he's at Klanfield, he'll say something along the lines ofIt’s just bantz ffs. Much prefer that to sly digs tbh.
Not strictly true. They got themselves banned for six.Hopefully when his at Klanfield, he'll say something along the lines of
"here at the home of the club that got all English clubs banned from Europe for 5 years after murdering 39 Juventus fans"