Gelsons Dad
Well-Known Member
So none then.Why would people vote out a Government who is both investing in infrastructure and has a healthy economy?
That's awful logic.
So none then.Why would people vote out a Government who is both investing in infrastructure and has a healthy economy?
That's awful logic.
But Brown was meant to be Keynesian. He should have run a surplus during the growth a la Germany. Then there'd have been no need to run up quite such a huge debt in 2008-10.And they had "similar levels of investment" to the pre-Blair Tories in that period didn't they? Which you'd have seen I mentioned if you'd read the rest of the sentence.
So none then.
So you accept Labour leave the economy in a mess with its "investing in infrastructure" and the Tories come in, mop up, get the economy on an even keel again and then pass the baton on for Labour to have another go at it?Why would people vote out a Government who is both investing in infrastructure and has a healthy economy?
That's awful logic.
Hmmm. But Tory governments get sacked whilst doing a good job.Of course none. That's like asking why City have never sacked a manager who just won them the league. Because they'd just won them the league. You don't sack people who are doing a good job.
But Brown was meant to be Keynesian. He should have run a surplus during the growth a la Germany. Then there'd have been no need to run up quite such a huge debt in 2008-10.
As I said before, there's a difference between a remortgage to build an extension and a 110% mortgage to fund a holiday in Florida.
Brown's public spending was as ideological as the Tory's austerity measures.
Hmmm. But Tory governments get sacked whilst doing a good job.
Nope.
Current budget deficit doesn't include capital spending.