But Brown was meant to be Keynesian. He should have run a surplus during the growth a la Germany. Then there'd have been no need to run up quite such a huge debt in 2008-10.
As I said before, there's a difference between a remortgage to build an extension and a 110% mortgage to fund a holiday in Florida.
Brown's public spending was as ideological as the Tory's austerity measures.
I was working with the Treasury in these key years. My 'memory' of the view people held of him was that he was a very frustrated man and keen to leave 'his own legacy' - after years of 'finding the funding for Blair's treats'.
People are after all people and you can perhaps understand this - after years of waiting his turn he wanted some big ticket items.
I think that this was behind his obsession with PFI - he must have known the damage he was doing long-term but he wanted to make his mark
Just my opinion
Last edited: