Oops. I read Hilts comment as a joke
Yeah I realise now! Went straight over my head, it's too early.
Oops. I read Hilts comment as a joke
A lot of casual racism in this thread over ms Abbott. Get well soon your country needs you.
Well, if Ms Abbott really is ill, I wish her a speedy recovery, after all, we're all humans with compassion for the sick.She's not been replaced he's just got someone to cover for the period of her "illness".
You wish.She's not been replaced he's just got someone to cover for the period of her "illness".
I hear you mate, and I don't seek to defend absolutely everything. I've been very critical of May in particular as you will have seen.
But all the things you cite are government spending reductions. That's what they are. A government spending too much and receiving too little, needs to cut its spending and boost its income. It does that by raising taxes and by making cuts.
It is of course unavoidable that cuts you describe are felt more by people who receive such benefits. But you cannot cut *nothing*, so what would you have them cut? More police cuts? Deeper NHS cuts? Seriously what would you have them cut MORE, in order to maintain the benefits you describe.
On the other side of the coin, taxes have been increased with more and more people paying 40% on part of their incomes. The reduction in the top rate from 50% to 45% may sound unsavoury (it does) but it actually raises MORE tax and therefore helps. Perhaps the Tories should not have cut it simply because doing so looks bad, I accept that. But cutting it did raise more money.
The ability of Ms Abbott had nothing to do with her race, nor was it ever suggested so on here.
tax more and enforce it properly
the only reason that reducing more the top rate increases revenue (a very neglible increase) is that more people stop trying evade paying it. Policing it better at highre rate would have more benefit.
You wish.
Now now. Don't shoot the messenger, Leonard.You wish.
I agree with your middle sentence. But you cannot "police" what is not illegal, and I don't think much activity is illegal. People earning £200k a year on PAYE have to pay whatever the tax rate is, since it's taken off them at source and there's nothing they can do about it.
So that is not the demographic we are talking about. The people who avoided (not evade) paying 50% are those who have their own businesses and / or who are worth millions, even billions. If tax rates are too high, they simply pay themselves elsewhere, or restructure their businesses in some other way to avoid it. This may be unfair, but that's what they do.
Looks like I don't have to worry now mate. Friday off work. Hope I'll be drinking to a Labour win.I really can't believe that people are putting Corbyn's stance on terror over real issues like the cuts to the NHS, Education, Welfare, the police that we already KNOW are going to happen if the Tories win. God knows what will happen that they haven't told us about.
To me this is the most important election since 1979, when there was a real and pressing need for fundamental political change. I unhesitatingly voted Conservative then because I thought they would reverse the decline in this country. This election it's the other way round - A Tory government will do incalculable damage to this country in my view, far worse than some Islamic nutter with a knife.
Where are the posts that mentioned her colour in relation to her lack of ability?Anyone who posted negativity on the ability of ms Abbott
Could we replace Theresa May with Boris? Have we left it too late?
Tax avoidance although not illegal is morally corrupt. We should point out all the celebs and businesses that are avoiding tax, and let the consumer decide if they want to spend their money with them.
Says it all, if Boris is your best bet.
Haha, your best contribution to this thread, have you considered stand up ?Could we replace Theresa May with Boris? Have we left it too late?