General transfer rumours

[Dr Jacoby]

Why would Liverpool sign him?

They are another side who pass the ball out from the back.

 

[Tricky_Trev]

Shame we missed out, perfect 3rd choice keeper.

This guy has done well for himself. He's barely played football for 20 years yet is a millionaire football player. I'd like to have seen him have more love for the game and drop down leagues to play regularly. But I guess being a shit, homegrown keeper with no desire has its advantages! Fair play.

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]

If Joe does take a pay cut, he's got a hell of a lot more credibility than most of us on here.

I certainly wouldn't, given his past service, whatever's gone on, Joe deserves to be paid off in full.

Yep he has a 3yr contract left and should be paid up

But he's not taking a pay cut is he?

 

[SWP's back]

If Joe does take a pay cut, he's got a hell of a lot more credibility than most of us on here.

I certainly wouldn't, given his past service, whatever's gone on, Joe deserves to be paid off in full.

So if we sell him to a team he wishes to move to for less money, we should pay up the difference?

 

[SWP's back]

Yep he has a 3yr contract left and should be paid up

If he's on loan it should be, if he signs a new contract then no.

 

[kaz7]

But he's not taking a pay cut is he?

The sun say he is willing to take one to get a move,if he stays then no he won't

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]

The sun say he is willing to take one to get a move,if he stays then no he won't

But if we pay his three years up, even if he moved for £1 a week, he'd still be on more than he is now. Whilst I'd prefer him to be staying, he'll do very well if he does manage a move, wherever he ends up.

 

[SWP's back]

The sun say he is willing to take one to get a move,if he stays then no he won't

So which is it?

The sun and he is happy to take a pay cut?

Or the other papers saying that City are happy to pay the bulk of his wages for him to move?

Because if it's the latter then City are being more than fair.

 

[kaz7]

So which is it?

The sun and he is happy to take a pay cut?

Or the other papers saying that City are happy to pay the bulk of his wages for him to move?

Because if it's the latter then City are being more than fair.

I don't know which it,he might take a paycut and we still need to help out with his wages to get a loan,all will become clear soon enough

 

[kaz7]