Whether you like it or not, it generally seems to be regarded as the right verdict based on the evidence presented.Shocking verdict for rittenhouse case , he did trumps bidding , striding around with his automatic gun extremely provocately (sp) and was clearly looking for a fight , we all know if he was black and shot three white men in that manner he would be in prison for life or executed , it fucking stinks
I watched him doing it , it was on cnn at the time and shown on sky again last night , manslaughter at the least not walking free, my other point standsWhether you like it or not, it generally seems to be regarded as the right verdict based on the evidence presented.
He was found not guilty of the crimes with which he was charged. There have been many hours of video evidence studied and those that have seen it all seem to generally agree that it was the right verdict (according to the law) as did the jury.I watched him doing it , it was on cnn at the time and shown on sky again last night , manslaughter at the least not walking free, my other point stands
You need to contact the prosecution and vent at them for putting forward such a shite case then.I watched him doing it , it was on cnn at the time and shown on sky again last night , manslaughter at the least not walking free, my other point stands
If he was black shooting white men he would be guiltyHe was found not guilty of the crimes with which he was charged. There have been many hours of video evidence studied and those that have seen it all seem to generally agree that it was the right verdict (according to the law) as did the jury.
Not sure what your other point was.
I sadly agree that that would be a possible outcome but that would be an incorrect verdict and that is the issue that should be dealt with. Not making another incorrect verdict to somehow balance things up.If he was black shooting white men he would be guilty
Album of the week last week.Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses.
Yes, you have to say that the defence did a sterling job and played the whole "self defence" thing to the max. With the whole A2 agenda and life and liberty..being a good "patriot", it was always likely to got hat way.He was found not guilty of the crimes with which he was charged. There have been many hours of video evidence studied and those that have seen it all seem to generally agree that it was the right verdict (according to the law) as did the jury.
Not sure what your other point was.