GMP: Two Teenagers Arrested In Anti-Terror Raid

Some data -

A study of grooming gangs has identified that 52 groups where ethnicity data was provided 26 were comprised of all Asian offenders (50 percent), 11 percent were all white (21 percent) and 9 percent had offenders from multiple ethnicities. 2 groups (4 perecent) were exclusively Arab groups.

Of the 306 offenders whose ethnicity was noted, 75 percent were categorised as Asian, 17 percent white and the remaining 8 percent black and 3 percent Arab.

97 percent of victims in the above samples were white.

The 27 court cases led to the convictions of 92 men. Some 79 (87 percent) were reported as being of South Asian Muslim origin.

So despite the fact that Muslims are a minority group that make up 7% of the population they overwhelmingly dominate rape and child abuse statistics.


And I quote one of our LWNJs;

So, if you can be arsed separating the words 'Muslim' from Paedo/ Grooming, you will find the truth in my original post that people of similar background will group together on certain things. The fact that they were Muslim, in these particular cases, does NOT separate them from other disgusting paedos that pray on our kids.

Paedos are fooking paedos.

Get that through your thick skulls.

I think we should look further into cultural issues that exist in some aspects of the Muslim community rather than simply label people as racists and RWNJ. I will repeat significant numbers the Muslim community recognise the extent of this problem and some young Muslim men's views on young white women as an issue.
 
worsleyweb said:
Some data -

A study of grooming gangs has identified that 52 groups where ethnicity data was provided 26 were comprised of all Asian offenders (50 percent), 11 percent were all white (21 percent) and 9 percent had offenders from multiple ethnicities. 2 groups (4 perecent) were exclusively Arab groups.

Of the 306 offenders whose ethnicity was noted, 75 percent were categorised as Asian, 17 percent white and the remaining 8 percent black and 3 percent Arab.

97 percent of victims in the above samples were white.

The 27 court cases led to the convictions of 92 men. Some 79 (87 percent) were reported as being of South Asian Muslim origin.

So despite the fact that Muslims are a minority group that make up 7% of the population they overwhelmingly dominate rape and child abuse statistics.


And I quote one of our LWNJs;

So, if you can be arsed separating the words 'Muslim' from Paedo/ Grooming, you will find the truth in my original post that people of similar background will group together on certain things. The fact that they were Muslim, in these particular cases, does NOT separate them from other disgusting paedos that pray on our kids.

Paedos are fooking paedos.

Get that through your thick skulls.

I think we should look further into cultural issues that exist in some aspects of the Muslim community rather than simply label people as racists and RWNJ. I will repeat significant numbers the Muslim community recognise the extent of this problem and some young Muslim men's views on young white women as an issue.

How can anyone comment on data with no source, no context , no reference etc. Is this official government data if so what is the source and why haven't you refered to The original source? I would love to take a look but that could be from Hansard, a daily mail article, an email from tommy Robinson or from a police report published as part of a major study?
 
Here you go.

<a class="postlink" href="http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/factcheck-grooming-gangs/18739" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/fac ... angs/18739</a>
 
EalingBlue2 said:
worsleyweb said:
Some data -

A study of grooming gangs has identified that 52 groups where ethnicity data was provided 26 were comprised of all Asian offenders (50 percent), 11 percent were all white (21 percent) and 9 percent had offenders from multiple ethnicities. 2 groups (4 perecent) were exclusively Arab groups.

Of the 306 offenders whose ethnicity was noted, 75 percent were categorised as Asian, 17 percent white and the remaining 8 percent black and 3 percent Arab.

97 percent of victims in the above samples were white.

The 27 court cases led to the convictions of 92 men. Some 79 (87 percent) were reported as being of South Asian Muslim origin.

So despite the fact that Muslims are a minority group that make up 7% of the population they overwhelmingly dominate rape and child abuse statistics.


And I quote one of our LWNJs;

So, if you can be arsed separating the words 'Muslim' from Paedo/ Grooming, you will find the truth in my original post that people of similar background will group together on certain things. The fact that they were Muslim, in these particular cases, does NOT separate them from other disgusting paedos that pray on our kids.

Paedos are fooking paedos.

Get that through your thick skulls.

I think we should look further into cultural issues that exist in some aspects of the Muslim community rather than simply label people as racists and RWNJ. I will repeat significant numbers the Muslim community recognise the extent of this problem and some young Muslim men's views on young white women as an issue.

How can anyone comment on data with no source, no context , no reference etc. Is this official government data if so what is the source and why haven't you refered to The original source? I would love to take a look but that could be from Hansard, a daily mail article, an email from tommy Robinson or from a police report published as part of a major study?

Oh look - linking someone not of your viewpoint to the EDL. Its boring Ealing Blue - for someone who made so much fuss about the Ched Evans case and nearly bored us all to death with it - you don't seem to fussed about this far more worrying issue.
 
worsleyweb said:
EalingBlue2 said:
worsleyweb said:
Some data -

A study of grooming gangs has identified that 52 groups where ethnicity data was provided 26 were comprised of all Asian offenders (50 percent), 11 percent were all white (21 percent) and 9 percent had offenders from multiple ethnicities. 2 groups (4 perecent) were exclusively Arab groups.

Of the 306 offenders whose ethnicity was noted, 75 percent were categorised as Asiuan, 17 percent white and the remaining 8 percent black and 3 percent Arab.

97 percent of victims in the above samples were white.

The 27 court cases led to the convictions of 92 men. Some 79 (87 percent) were reported as being of South Asian Muslim origin.

So despite the fact that Muslims are a minority group that make up 7% of the population they overwhelmingly dominate rape and child abuse statistics.


And I quote one of our LWNJs;

So, if you can be arsed separating the words 'Muslim' from Paedo/ Grooming, you will find the truth in my original post that people of similar background will group together on certain things. The fact that they were Muslim, in these particular cases, does NOT separate them from other disgusting paedos that pray on our kids.

Paedos are fooking paedos.

Get that through your thick skulls.

I think we should look further into cultural issues that exist in some aspects of the Muslim community rather than simply label people as racists and RWNJ. I will repeat significant numbers the Muslim community recognise the extent of this problem and some young Muslim men's views on young white women as an issue.

How can anyone comment on data with no source, no context , no reference etc. Is this official government data if so what is the source and why haven't you refered to The original source? I would love to take a look but that could be from Hansard, a daily mail article, an email from tommy Robinson or from a police report published as part of a major study?

Oh look - linking someone not of your viewpoint to the EDL. Its boring Ealing Blue - for someone who made so much fuss about the Ched Evans case and nearly bored us all to death with it - you don't seem to fussed about this far more worrying issue.

Am just asking for the context and references so I can look at it and comment. Abhor such things whatever the context but commenting on it with no context would be the same as relying on Cheds website for views on that which I criticised.

If anyone put up numbers with no context , no reference surely anyone would ask for the facts, something most of us probably have to do in work every day.
 
EalingBlue2 said:
worsleyweb said:
EalingBlue2 said:
How can anyone comment on data with no source, no context , no reference etc. Is this official government data if so what is the source and why haven't you refered to The original source? I would love to take a look but that could be from Hansard, a daily mail article, an email from tommy Robinson or from a police report published as part of a major study?

Oh look - linking someone not of your viewpoint to the EDL. Its boring Ealing Blue - for someone who made so much fuss about the Ched Evans case and nearly bored us all to death with it - you don't seem to fussed about this far more worrying issue.

Am just asking for the context and references so I can look at it and comment. Abhor such things whatever the context but commenting on it with no context would be the same as relying on Cheds website for views on that which I criticised.

If anyone put up numbers with no context , no reference surely anyone would ask for the facts, something most of us probably have to do in work every day.

Well he's put the link up now as requested by you so you can study it and draw your own conclusions. As you can see, it's not been written by Tommy Robinson or Nick Griffin so we can safely assume that it hasn't been penned with a specific agenda in mind.
 
EalingBlue2 said:
worsleyweb said:
EalingBlue2 said:
How can anyone comment on data with no source, no context , no reference etc. Is this official government data if so what is the source and why haven't you refered to The original source? I would love to take a look but that could be from Hansard, a daily mail article, an email from tommy Robinson or from a police report published as part of a major study?

Oh look - linking someone not of your viewpoint to the EDL. Its boring Ealing Blue - for someone who made so much fuss about the Ched Evans case and nearly bored us all to death with it - you don't seem to fussed about this far more worrying issue.

Am just asking for the context and references so I can look at it and comment. Abhor such things whatever the context but commenting on it with no context would be the same as relying on Cheds website for views on that which I criticised.

If anyone put up numbers with no context , no reference surely anyone would ask for the facts, something most of us probably have to do in work every day.

Why not just ask then? Why the reference to Tommy Robinson? There are countless sources of evidence of this issue from various sources. No doubt you will try and find an angle to try and discredit them rather than just once maybe say "you know what there is an issue in the Muslim community with this issue and i hope with support and education it can be overcome".

Try and see a different viewpoint - just this once.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.