Goalkeeper

WRicko said:
Why should I repeat myself ? Why not read what I have put? But for at least the third time if the club has two goalies of equally quality and neither will sit on the bench for the other. Who is the club going to keep and who are they going to sell the younger goalie on less money or the older goalie on more money ?
Click to expand...

But they're not of equal quality and a year of Steffen sitting on our bench doesn't change that. Ederson's made some costly mistakes this season yes, but is he still a top 5 itw? yes. Any other opinion is a load of nonsense.
 
WRicko said:
Why should I repeat myself ? Why not read what I have put? But for at least the third time if the club has two goalies of equally quality and neither will sit on the bench for the other. Who is the club going to keep and who are they going to sell the younger goalie on less money or the older goalie on more money ?
Click to expand...


For what it's worth, it was a rhetorical question. The correct answer is "nothing".
One year in age is irrelevant and so is the difference in wages CURRENTLY.
You seem to be saying that if they are both of equal quality in the future then we will dump Ederson because he is a year older and is on a higher wage NOW.
And this is after making up a scenario where he is as good as Ederson.
 
Last edited:
Wolves beckon for Steppen
33235cb763daeb9346f80bdb8ac8d602.jpg
 
WRicko said:
Read what I have been saying properly before complete miss representing what I have said.

Let me restate it Steffen is very similar to Edderson not that I have seen much of him but over 12 months younger and no doubt on significantly less wages also looks to be improving very quickly.

He defiantly passes like him perhaps not yet as good. I have seen him come out in much the same way as Edderson perhaps not as aggressive but also means he does not nearly break his team mates neck or get sent off. Cannot really compare ability to command the area because we control games so don’t face too many crosses but I don’t think it’s Eddersons strength not really able to compare shot stopping ability because he faces a lot more shots than Edderson and the shots are very different but on paper he looks a lot better than Edderson.

Based on the limited amount of what I have seen I think City will be caught in two minds between keeping and loaning him. We are going to loose two back up keepers so we will need him However we will want to keep and develop him loaning out would work better.

My guess is he won’t want to be a cup goalie. Will go on loan for 12 months then it will be him or Edderson for no1

My point linked to wages was he does not have to be better than Edderson Just equal to we don’t do favorites just best. If you where Tixi and in a years time had two goalies of equally ability neither of which would sit on the bench who would you keep and who would you sell the younger goalie on cheaper wages or the older goalie on bigger wages (no brainer).

Based on limited knowledge my bet is in 12 months after a loan he is level with Edderson and Edderson goes and he stays
Click to expand...

Based on limited knowledge, it's spelt Ederson.
 
WRicko said:
Read what I have been saying properly before complete miss representing what I have said.

Let me restate it Steffen is very similar to Edderson not that I have seen much of him but over 12 months younger and no doubt on significantly less wages also looks to be improving very quickly.

He defiantly passes like him perhaps not yet as good. I have seen him come out in much the same way as Edderson perhaps not as aggressive but also means he does not nearly break his team mates neck or get sent off. Cannot really compare ability to command the area because we control games so don’t face too many crosses but I don’t think it’s Eddersons strength not really able to compare shot stopping ability because he faces a lot more shots than Edderson and the shots are very different but on paper he looks a lot better than Edderson.

Based on the limited amount of what I have seen I think City will be caught in two minds between keeping and loaning him. We are going to loose two back up keepers so we will need him However we will want to keep and develop him loaning out would work better.

My guess is he won’t want to be a cup goalie. Will go on loan for 12 months then it will be him or Edderson for no1

My point linked to wages was he does not have to be better than Edderson Just equal to we don’t do favorites just best. If you where Tixi and in a years time had two goalies of equally ability neither of which would sit on the bench who would you keep and who would you sell the younger goalie on cheaper wages or the older goalie on bigger wages (no brainer).

Based on limited knowledge my bet is in 12 months after a loan he is level with Edderson and Edderson goes and he stays
Click to expand...
WRicko said:
Read what I have been saying properly before complete miss representing what I have said.

Let me restate it Steffen is very similar to Edderson not that I have seen much of him but over 12 months younger and no doubt on significantly less wages also looks to be improving very quickly.

He defiantly passes like him perhaps not yet as good. I have seen him come out in much the same way as Edderson perhaps not as aggressive but also means he does not nearly break his team mates neck or get sent off. Cannot really compare ability to command the area because we control games so don’t face too many crosses but I don’t think it’s Eddersons strength not really able to compare shot stopping ability because he faces a lot more shots than Edderson and the shots are very different but on paper he looks a lot better than Edderson.

Based on the limited amount of what I have seen I think City will be caught in two minds between keeping and loaning him. We are going to loose two back up keepers so we will need him However we will want to keep and develop him loaning out would work better.

My guess is he won’t want to be a cup goalie. Will go on loan for 12 months then it will be him or Edderson for no1

My point linked to wages was he does not have to be better than Edderson Just equal to we don’t do favorites just best. If you where Tixi and in a years time had two goalies of equally ability neither of which would sit on the bench who would you keep and who would you sell the younger goalie on cheaper wages or the older goalie on bigger wages (no brainer).

Based on limited knowledge my bet is in 12 months after a loan he is level with Edderson and Edderson goes and he stays
Click to expand...

Clarkie, is that you?

There is 0% chance of this happening.
 
OliMCFC said:
But they're not of equal quality and a year of Steffen sitting on our bench doesn't change that. Ederson's made some costly mistakes this season yes, but is he still a top 5 itw? yes. Any other opinion is a load of nonsense.
Click to expand...

And I have said several times there does not look much between them right now and that Steffen will go on loan. Also this was I. Direct response to someone say Steffen had to be Ederson plus I.e better than Ederson he doesn’t he just has to be equal to him because we won’t keep both long terms and he is younger and cheaper
 
Barcon said:
For what it's worth, it was a rhetorical question. The correct answer is "nothing".
One year in age is irrelevant and so is the difference in wages CURRENTLY.
You seem to be saying that if they are both of equal quality in the future then we will dump Ederson because he is a year older and is on a higher wage NOW.
And this is after making up a scenario where he is as good as Ederson.
Click to expand...

No I always said in a year from now
 
Out of interest why are there about 10 passive aggressive people on here all misrepresenting what I am saying having not actually read what I have said can you all grow up and read
 
WRicko said:
Out of interest why are there about 10 passive aggressive people on here all misrepresenting what I am saying having not actually read what I have said can you all grow up and read
Click to expand...
It happens all the time, not just on here but in life as well I'm afraid. Some people don't want to listen (or in this case read) and comprehend your point and have a discussion, finding some compromise in values for an overall better understanding of things. They just want to have their opinions, say/type what they want to say/type and most importantly be right.

We all do it from time to time, but it's definitely annoying when it happens to one's self.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.