Didsbury Dave said:Norville Rogers said:i was on his college course, he knows his stuff hes very opinianated, i dont agree with alot of what he says but to his credit he always backs an argument up from both sides and he really does know his football, hes had management jobs offred to him but he refuses.
He's pretty damn patient with some of the clueless callers, too.
Last night some lad rings up. "We should never have got rid of Hughes"
Gleghorn says "Fair enough. What do you think Hughes would have done differently tonight?"
Caller, all indignant, "We just shouldn't have got rid of him"
Glaghorn "I understand your point mate. So do you think City would have won under Hughes?"
Caller "Don't know"
Glaghorn "Well you're saying that it was a mistake to sack Hughes. Don't you have an opinion on tonight's game and whether it would have been different under hughes"
Caller "No".
He has the patience of a saint dealing with some of those callers. I'd have told him to come back when he's grown a brain cell.
dave bacuzzi said:Didsbury Dave, It was his negative comments about Mancini before the game that pissed me off
therefore i didn't listen to the commentary.
you should know, he copied yours off hereDidsbury Dave said:dave bacuzzi said:Didsbury Dave, It was his negative comments about Mancini before the game that pissed me off
therefore i didn't listen to the commentary.
What was his opinion?
the goats backside said:No DD it was the game where he said, " were playing 10 men only 1 team going to win" 2 mins later were 1 down. Also he did his match summary when GB scored, the game went on for 8 mins more. He said, "City HAVE moved upto 4th" He was that busy going on i hadnt even realised the final whistle had gone.
Its in The Blood said:Quite right it wouldnt, because Gleghorn would have had an easy talk show, although he would still not have know who and when we played next.
Going to listen to Gary Owen in future, can take his negative comments because he feels the hurt.
Like you say everyone has there opinions, GORDONS and mine are just the same. Gleghorn should not be a City Pundit on a LOCAL Radio Station.
Its in The Blood said:Quite right it wouldnt, because Gleghorn would have had an easy talk show, although he would still not have know who and when we played next.
Going to listen to Gary Owen in future, can take his negative comments because he feels the hurt.
Like you say everyone has there opinions, GORDONS and mine are just the same. Gleghorn should not be a City Pundit on a LOCAL Radio Station.
Its in The Blood said:Mmmm Fred Eyre did City against Joke???? Gleghorn doing some Joke station I wonder??
He wasnt even sure who and when we played next, last night.
He is NO CITY pundit end of, was just an average 2 Division ex-player (34 games for City) commenting on players that are far better than he ever was, may as well get Berti on there.
Fred Eyre for me every time at least he's Manchester Born and Bred
Yes I was p*ssed last night, about his negative comments.
Dont drink or do drugs just follow City all over the country SUPPORTING the team through thick and thin unlike some.
Its in The Blood said:Guadino, I'm after an Audi R8 for Fiesta money, dont care about the history. Have you got anything?
Anyway, I agree with you on some of the Muppet callers especially the lad that sounded like he was having a spliff whilst stating that we shouldnt have got rid of Hughes.
Only started this thread as a joke and its got so serious.
Just goes to show how fans have different opinions as do pundits, I just don't think Gleghorn is City enough to be a Pundit for City thats all and that is MY PERSONAL VIEW. I have a choice to switch radio stations and in future my family of 4 season tickets holders will be switching channels when he is on.