Ancient Citizen said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
It would be a problem for me if we sent anyone to somewhere where there was a genuine prospect of them being tortured, as I'm sure it would for the gentleman who drafted the ECHR.
I'm sure the chap who drafted the act did not intend that any murderer, terrorist, preacher of hate or other such undesirables would be free to enter our country and claim protection under the act, as has happened recently.
I'm sure he didn't and if he saw the world we inhabit today, I imagine it would blow his mind - in both a positive and negative sense - however isn't that, in actual fact, the point?
In an at times bewilderingly ever-changing world it is vital that we have certain totemic principles that the state and the bodies that perform its functions are legally obliged to uphold. Certain rights which cannot (unless it is proportionate to do so) be departed from, irrespective of how much the sands around us shift.
Much like the benefit system, there will always be individuals that exploit it, that is the nature of human affairs, but it is surely correct that these principles (that you appear to accept
per se) are enshrined in British law, and as Chris says, actually give people recourse within this jurisdiction, rather than having to go to Strasbourg to seek a resolution.