Grenfell Tower block disaster

They key thing about Grenfell is that someone should be going to prison for a long time it's just a question of who.
Someone lied somewhere along the track and it's finding out who this person is that's the hard bit. Is it the person who signed off the cladding as being safe, is it the company CEO lying about their cheap fire proof cladding, is it the councillors for cutting the budget knowing full well the cladding wasn't fire proof. Someone has lied somewhere and whoever this is they need to be out on trial for manslaughter.
 
BerkshireBlue said:
They key thing about Grenfell is that someone should be going to prison for a long time it's just a question of who.
Someone lied somewhere along the track and it's finding out who this person is that's the hard bit. Is it the person who signed off the cladding as being safe, is it the company CEO lying about their cheap fire proof cladding, is it the councillors for cutting the budget knowing full well the cladding wasn't fire proof. Someone has lied somewhere and whoever this is they need to be out on trial for manslaughter.
Click to expand...

my money is on some minion at a subbie's who probably wrote the incorrect name of some cladding on an order form - somebody will pay for this and you can bet your bottom dollar they are already searching for the least senior person in each link in the chain to pin the blame on. Mrs Miggins who takes the tea trolley round the council offices is looking a good bet too.
 
bluethrunthru said:
As for the hotel accommodation thats as much down to the absurd property market in London that means suitable alternative ( and cheaper ) accommodation probably isn't available.
Click to expand...

He has his own place so the property market doesn’t come into it.
 
This is the problem with off topic. Some people are so hell bent on carrying on their own line of argument that they can’t remotely engage with something that doesn’t agree with that argument.

No one is arguing that someone doesn’t do time for the tragedy. This story is completely separate however and it’s a chancer just wanting to live off the council (tax payer) and profit from a tragedy. But some on here would rather ignore than and attack the source or deflect rather than decry his actions.
 
SWP's back said:
This is the problem with off topic. Some people are so hell bent on carrying on their own line of argument that they can’t remotely engage with something that doesn’t agree with that argument.

No one is arguing that someone doesn’t do time for the tragedy. This story is completely separate however and it’s a chancer just wanting to live off the council (tax payer) and profit from a tragedy. But some on here would rather ignore than and attack the source or deflect rather than decry his actions.
Click to expand...

The guys an utter **** and taking the fucking piss, he’d be no less off staying in his own home but he obviously feels he can sponge from the state and have a free ride. He should be fucked back off to his apartment and the money spent on some of the more worthwhile affected by the tragedy.
 
Even the article itself is selfcontradicting

"However this wider group is made up of those who were unofficially living with partners, friends or relatives, or were sub-letting from named tenants. It also includes those who have said they were sleeping rough in communal areas of the tower"

that's all the evidence I need to say that the article is bullshit and made up
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.