BlueBearBoots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 11,789
Guess - well I've got the BBQ going - pottered around the garden - spent a bit of time in the potting shetd where I have wifi of course so I can keep up with BM
Is it Corky1970?UUBlue said:I'm an inflationary cosmologist/string theorist. I do not typically, or at least not exclusively, think of the big bang as "the beginning" of everything. And my impression is other researchers have that same opinion. Our current physical theories tell us that once upon a time, the universe must have been very very "small" and hot and dense. However, before that time period, we have no idea. Whatever existed before that time probably did not resemble the universe as we know it in any way, so it is the beginning of our universe as we know it in that sense. But the big bang could have erupted within a much larger universe that could have been around forever.
karen7 said:Papos,don't know how to spell it but the greek fella
Prestwich_Blue said:Is it Corky1970?UUBlue said:I'm an inflationary cosmologist/string theorist. I do not typically, or at least not exclusively, think of the big bang as "the beginning" of everything. And my impression is other researchers have that same opinion. Our current physical theories tell us that once upon a time, the universe must have been very very "small" and hot and dense. However, before that time period, we have no idea. Whatever existed before that time probably did not resemble the universe as we know it in any way, so it is the beginning of our universe as we know it in that sense. But the big bang could have erupted within a much larger universe that could have been around forever.
BlueBearBoots said:Guess - well I've got the BBQ going - pottered around the garden - spent a bit of time in the potting shetd where I have wifi of course so I can keep up with BM
Prestwich_Blue said:Is it Corky1970?UUBlue said:I'm an inflationary cosmologist/string theorist. I do not typically, or at least not exclusively, think of the big bang as "the beginning" of everything. And my impression is other researchers have that same opinion. Our current physical theories tell us that once upon a time, the universe must have been very very "small" and hot and dense. However, before that time period, we have no idea. Whatever existed before that time probably did not resemble the universe as we know it in any way, so it is the beginning of our universe as we know it in that sense. But the big bang could have erupted within a much larger universe that could have been around forever.
Kun Aguero said:" Oasis are the bees knees me old mukka, I hate the West Ham fans fucking cunts wanting Sammy out, where the fuck Damocles, man never walked on moon, Nick Clegg is a ****"
UUBlue said:I'm an inflationary cosmologist/string theorist. I do not typically, or at least not exclusively, think of the big bang as "the beginning" of everything. And my impression is other researchers have that same opinion. Our current physical theories tell us that once upon a time, the universe must have been very very "small" and hot and dense. However, before that time period, we have no idea. Whatever existed before that time probably did not resemble the universe as we know it in any way, so it is the beginning of our universe as we know it in that sense. But the big bang could have erupted within a much larger universe that could have been around forever.
nijinsky's fetlocks said:Kun Aguero said:" Oasis are the bees knees me old mukka, I hate the West Ham fans fucking cunts wanting Sammy out, where the fuck Damocles, man never walked on moon, Nick Clegg is a ****"
It's that farrkinn khaannt markt85.