FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
So whats the latest with Guidetti?
EalingBlue2 said:Nonsense the idea that you should spend money for the sake of it just in case rules change and you are allowed to spend money!
Unless we get an injury or we sell one on the core squad ( why would we) then we only gave home grown available.
Name me one home grown player who is not injured , who is affordable , who would give up first team football for our bench and whose club would sell to us. We would do no better than Sinclair or Richards so why throw money away on nothing? That is mark Hughes management and we are now better than that!!!!
FantasyIreland said:So whats the latest with Guidetti?
Monkchester said:EalingBlue2 said:Nonsense the idea that you should spend money for the sake of it just in case rules change and you are allowed to spend money!
Unless we get an injury or we sell one on the core squad ( why would we) then we only gave home grown available.
Name me one home grown player who is not injured , who is affordable , who would give up first team football for our bench and whose club would sell to us. We would do no better than Sinclair or Richards so why throw money away on nothing? That is mark Hughes management and we are now better than that!!!!
Without these ridiculous FFP rules, money is not an issue for us - so spending money wthin our imposed cap is a no brainer - even if it is on a squad player that gives us more cover - if nasty is going why not look at getting someone like Shawcross in to cover for any long term injuries suspensions etc. at CB or someone on a one year contract to cover for negredo until fully fit again. As long as we play by their rules there is nothing to worry about and if we keep improving our turnover year by year FFP will not affect us in two years time. We no longer have to "rob Peter to pay Paul " like we did a few years ago so let's make the most of it. I am not saying buy for the sake of it but let's spend what we can within these daft rules and then blow them away on the pitch.
FantasyIreland said:FantasyIreland said:So whats the latest with Guidetti?
HolisticJim said:FantasyIreland said:FantasyIreland said:So whats the latest with Guidetti?
bluesince76 said:Monkchester said:EalingBlue2 said:Nonsense the idea that you should spend money for the sake of it just in case rules change and you are allowed to spend money!
Unless we get an injury or we sell one on the core squad ( why would we) then we only gave home grown available.
Name me one home grown player who is not injured , who is affordable , who would give up first team football for our bench and whose club would sell to us. We would do no better than Sinclair or Richards so why throw money away on nothing? That is mark Hughes management and we are now better than that!!!!
Without these ridiculous FFP rules, money is not an issue for us - so spending money wthin our imposed cap is a no brainer - even if it is on a squad player that gives us more cover - if nasty is going why not look at getting someone like Shawcross in to cover for any long term injuries suspensions etc. at CB or someone on a one year contract to cover for negredo until fully fit again. As long as we play by their rules there is nothing to worry about and if we keep improving our turnover year by year FFP will not affect us in two years time. We no longer have to "rob Peter to pay Paul " like we did a few years ago so let's make the most of it. I am not saying buy for the sake of it but let's spend what we can within these daft rules and then blow them away on the pitch.
So who do we get on a 'one year contract' to replace Negredo, who should be back by October? Are we spending £25m buying them and then just giving them a one year deal, or is there a mysterious free agent out there who'd improve our squad but would be willing to sign just a one year deal?