Hamsik or Gourcuff??

[bell_mcfc]

Subject says it all really, who would you prefer?
There both similar players and have been linked with both. I still think Ireland should stay but wouldnt mind seeing one of these come in. Personally i would like to see Gourcuff in, from what i have seen off him he looks like a top quality player, but then again i havent seen much of Hamsik so i cant really compare.

Hamsik:
2004 Slovan Bratislava 6 (1)
2004–2007 Brescia 65 (10)
2007– Napoli 106 (30)

Gourcuff:
2003–2006 Rennes 66 (6)
2006–2009 Milan 36 (1)
2008–2009 → Bordeaux (loan) 37 (12)
2009– Bordeaux 27 (6)

 

[Daz_Blue]

Gourcuff but would be happy with either

 

[chazmcfc]

Either, but if i had to choose Gourcuff. He is bigger, and used to a game at high speed AND has chapions league experience. Hamsik has none of those attributes.

 

[Ovo]

Gourcuff for me. Purely because I have never seen Hamsik play.

 

[Lmarkham-blueblood]

if gourcuff came he would easily be the best CM in the premiership.
gourcuff has a slight edge over hamsik in pretty much every area IMHO

 

[ifiwasarichfan]

Not seen much of either, but after following the Board and speculation the concensus seems to favour Gourcoff. I would be delighted with either.

 

[Zzonked]

It's obviously Gourcuff.

He won the Ligue 1 player of the year. Now I know some people might think "it's only French football" but he was named the best player in French football. Some former winners include Zidane, Essien, Drogba.

 

[Mancityfans.net'er]

why the fuck arent we in for gourcuff then?!

Sign him up before arsenal replace cesc with him. Stop trying to get ''superstars''

 

[C_T_I_D]

Hamsik. He's a younger Lampard and exactly what we lack.

 

[Andouble]

why the fuck arent we in for gourcuff then?!

Sign him up before arsenal replace cesc with him. Stop trying to get ''superstars''

Gourcuff is too old for Wenger.