Harry due in court on Monday 23rd January 2012 (merged)

Harry is trying to play the innocent fool in the hope of getting off. He try's to bring in humour , mentions his charity work and name drops eg, Beckhams.

However he clearly knows exactly what the score is, you don't get to own a multi million mansion in Sandbanks without being financially astute. He also took us to the cleaners on the Adebayor deal in the summer. He's no fool.

Let's just hope the jury don't fall for all this charade. He tried the tax dodge because he felt he could get way with it.
 
kismet said:
Harry is trying to play the innocent fool in the hope of getting off. He try's to bring in humour , mentions his charity work and name drops eg, Beckhams.

However he clearly knows exactly what the score is, you don't get to own a multi million mansion in Sandbanks without being financially astute. He also took us to the cleaners on the Adebayor deal in the summer. He's no fool.

Let's just hope the jury don't fall for all this charade. He tried the tax dodge because he felt he could get way with it.
He sure as hell knows the difference between 5% and 10%.
Take him down.
 
kismet said:
Harry is trying to play the innocent fool in the hope of getting off. He try's to bring in humour , mentions his charity work and name drops eg, Beckhams.

However he clearly knows exactly what the score is, you don't get to own a multi million mansion in Sandbanks without being financially astute. He also took us to the cleaners on the Adebayor deal in the summer. He's no fool.

Let's just hope the jury don't fall for all this charade. He tried the tax dodge because he felt he could get way with it.


He's doing what everyone in court does. Chatting shit and doing the 'it's not my fault bit'.

From reading about the case here and elsewhere and from my times in court with work (on the good guys side) I doubt he's going down. I suspect he'll be found guilty with a fine and a suspended sentence. He's not even in line for Community Service or the courts favourite cop out a tagging order. Taggings are given a lot for offences that have no relevance all the time.
 
Blumers Bloomers said:
I take it the football allegiances of the jury members is supposedly not questioned or deemed relevant?

Reason I ask.......say you were called up to a jury for a similar case, where Slur Alex was charged with tax evasion..................hands up who'd be finding him guilty regardless of there not being evidence???!! I know I d be doing my best to get him sent down

No way. That would be against how I was brought up to be a sound person with good morales who could make an impartial decision whoever was being tried.




















Oh you said Slur Alex? Well fuck my morales that twats guilty as sin.
 
I'm not sure if they reconvene on Monday or if they wait till Tuesay

Should be over early next week
 
Sour Alex= longest serving premiership manager in England..

Arry'= longest serving premiership manager in Wandsworth..
 
Are Redknapp and Mandaric on the same side or against each other?

If he gets found guilty, what are the chances of him actually being sent down?
 
117 M34 said:
Are Redknapp and Mandaric on the same side or against each other?

If he gets found guilty, what are the chances of him actually being sent down?

I would imagine quite high....Such a high profile case and the HMRC will want to set a prescident surely..
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.