Here's a nice touch from the people at mousebreaker!
http://www.mousebreaker.com/games/bungabulldog/playgame
http://www.mousebreaker.com/games/bungabulldog/playgame
He sure as hell knows the difference between 5% and 10%.kismet said:Harry is trying to play the innocent fool in the hope of getting off. He try's to bring in humour , mentions his charity work and name drops eg, Beckhams.
However he clearly knows exactly what the score is, you don't get to own a multi million mansion in Sandbanks without being financially astute. He also took us to the cleaners on the Adebayor deal in the summer. He's no fool.
Let's just hope the jury don't fall for all this charade. He tried the tax dodge because he felt he could get way with it.
kismet said:Harry is trying to play the innocent fool in the hope of getting off. He try's to bring in humour , mentions his charity work and name drops eg, Beckhams.
However he clearly knows exactly what the score is, you don't get to own a multi million mansion in Sandbanks without being financially astute. He also took us to the cleaners on the Adebayor deal in the summer. He's no fool.
Let's just hope the jury don't fall for all this charade. He tried the tax dodge because he felt he could get way with it.
Blumers Bloomers said:I take it the football allegiances of the jury members is supposedly not questioned or deemed relevant?
Reason I ask.......say you were called up to a jury for a similar case, where Slur Alex was charged with tax evasion..................hands up who'd be finding him guilty regardless of there not being evidence???!! I know I d be doing my best to get him sent down
117 M34 said:Are Redknapp and Mandaric on the same side or against each other?
If he gets found guilty, what are the chances of him actually being sent down?